How do know what’s true? Truth; debate

@Metal-Brain said
I did not say the election was stolen. I posted a report that said Dominion voting machines did in Antrim County. You claimed it was a lie without evidence. Either report could be a lie, but you chose to believe the one you wanted to.

Dominion would have to sue to prove it is a lie and they did not do that. So perhaps it is not a lie.

Don't kid yourself. You replied to a post that stated there is no evidence the election was stolen and you wrote "there is evidence" and then you pasted a link to a study showing that there were no data that indicated systematic voter fraud. You're contradicting your own evidence and your own common sense

@Mott-The-Hoople said
What do you think Covid 19 was designed for?

It also got used to manipulate an election.

You are so full of the S word, you know, POOP, you can't see ACTUAL reality any more. You ONLY see the lies POOPED out of Trumps ass.

@Metal-Brain said
CO2 is creating arsonists?

You are SO PROFOUND. If a PRO actually FOUND you they would laugh their asses off and dump you back in the river.

@Mott-The-Hoople said
What do you think Covid 19 was designed for?

It also got used to manipulate an election.

You all resort to the dumb conspiracies just because Trump couldn't possibly have botched the COVID response right? Not your dear leader?

Epidemics have been happening for millenia. A virus hit Greece in 430 BC and 25% of Athenians died. About 100 years ago we had a big one that hit the whole world because lots of people were traveling to war. This is called a pandemic. When airplanes were invented everyone knew that the next outbreak like that would be global. So we formed action plans, trained infectious disease scientists, and the government had a team of people ready to respond. Around the year 2000 several researchers highlighted the wetmarkets as a place where coronaviruses might jump from animals to humans. There were more minor outbreaks like birdflu and SARS that we contained with smart planning, and the viruses were less deadly.

Do you think Birdflu and SARS were designed to manipulate elections? No, that'd be a dumb thing to say. The only difference is who was President. Trump the narcissist wanted you MAGA idjits to rally around the theory that Chyna had been cooking up a virus in a lab and planned to release it on the world in a precisely timed way to negatively influence Trump? That's also dumb.

Do you know what would have really helped Trump win that election? Be a competent leader. Tell people the truth. Hire the right people. Make smart decisions. Take responsibility when things don't roll out perfectly and make changes according to new information.

He didn't do any of that. The pandemic exposed him as a bad leader. His whole presidency he just rode the coattails of Obama's economy until there was a crisis and he botched it.

@wildgrass said
You all resort to the dumb conspiracies just because Trump couldn't possibly have botched the COVID response right? Not your dear leader?

Epidemics have been happening for millenia. A virus hit Greece in 430 BC and 25% of Athenians died. About 100 years ago we had a big one that hit the whole world because lots of people were traveling to war. This is called a pandemic. ...[text shortened]... presidency he just rode the coattails of Obama's economy until there was a crisis and he botched it.

Trump trailed Biden in virtually every poll in 2020 before and after COVID broke. https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2020/trump-vs-biden

@wildgrass said
Don't kid yourself. You replied to a post that stated there is no evidence the election was stolen and you wrote "there is evidence" and then you pasted a link to a study showing that there were no data that indicated systematic voter fraud. You're contradicting your own evidence and your own common sense

That was evidence. It was an official report, but the report was disputed.
Your problem is that both reports are disputed, so how do you know which one is accurate?

You don't. You are picking the one you want to believe. I am honest enough to say I don't know which one is the truth. But Dominion not suing for defamation is suspect. Perhaps they don't have a case.

@sonhouse said
You are SO PROFOUND. If a PRO actually FOUND you they would laugh their asses off and dump you back in the river.

People start most forest fires because they are careless or arsonists.
It has nothing to do with the climate.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/06/us/spokane-washington-wildfires-suspect-charges

@Metal-Brain said
That was evidence. It was an official report, but the report was disputed.
Your problem is that both reports are disputed, so how do you know which one is accurate?

You don't. You are picking the one you want to believe. I am honest enough to say I don't know which one is the truth. But Dominion not suing for defamation is suspect. Perhaps they don't have a case.

Nah, the thing didn't say what you said it said. You wrote that there was evidence, and then you said the only way to get the evidence would be to get inside the computer. Which is impossible.

Some crackpot says the moon is falling, and you would go along with it even though the "evidence" was based on hearsay and conjecture.

Complete the loop. The election wasn't stolen because there was evidence that the election was stolen. The election was stolen because Trump tweeted about it.

@Metal-Brain said
People start most forest fires because they are careless or arsonists.
It has nothing to do with the climate.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/06/us/spokane-washington-wildfires-suspect-charges

Ah, Lightning never starts forest fires. Good to know.

@wildgrass said
Nah, the thing didn't say what you said it said. You wrote that there was evidence, and then you said the only way to get the evidence would be to get inside the computer. Which is impossible.

Some crackpot says the moon is falling, and you would go along with it even though the "evidence" was based on hearsay and conjecture.

Complete the loop. The election wasn't sto ...[text shortened]... e was evidence that the election was stolen. The election was stolen because Trump tweeted about it.

Both reports are alleged evidence, but Dominion did not sue the one they alleged lied. That is suspect. Dominion doesn't like money?

@Metal-Brain said
Both reports are alleged evidence, but Dominion did not sue the one they alleged lied. That is suspect. Dominion doesn't like money?

No.

@sonhouse said
Ah, Lightning never starts forest fires. Good to know.

We all know people start most forest fires. Stop fooling yourself.

@wildgrass said
No.

You think Dominion doesn't like money? They say money makes the world go round. You don't really think Dominion failed to sue because it was a pack of lies. It would defy logic if they really had a case.

@Metal-Brain said
You think Dominion doesn't like money? They say money makes the world go round. You don't really think Dominion failed to sue because it was a pack of lies. It would defy logic if they really had a case.

What the h*** are you talking about? There is zero evidence that anything that dominion machines did anything that might be considered illegal. Why ungods green earth would you focus on a lawsuit it makes no sense?

@wildgrass said
What the h*** are you talking about? There is zero evidence that anything that dominion machines did anything that might be considered illegal. Why ungods green earth would you focus on a lawsuit it makes no sense?

How could you possibly know? You have 2 contradictory reports that cannot both be true. How did you determine which one was true?

Suing to get money makes no sense? LOL!
You know better. That is the main reason people sue. The other is to restore their reputation after slanderous lies were told. You are suggesting Dominion didn't care about either. So why did they sue FOX?

You are contradictory and illogical. FOX is not responsible for Pirro believing a report you know exists. Now the whole lawsuit against FOX was a fraud. They cannot believe reports anymore? Believing official reports does not make anybody liable for defamation. FOX was not the source of the defamation. The first report was.

FOX settled by choice when they could have won. Nobody is liable for reading an official report and repeating the findings. If you repeated the findings of Mueller's report on his investigation into Trump would you be liable for defamation? Of course not. Stop the double standard. That is flawed logic either way.