@Suzianne said“You're taking yourself down, with crappier weather and crappier air and crappier water.”
You're taking yourself down, with crappier weather and crappier air and crappier water.
Just fix the damned problem!
Why do you hate doing anything for America/Americans?
Life expectancy is higher now than any other time.
@Pus saidYeah, we want to leave out the Cons and trust the Pro's, eh🙂 One thing Trump HATES, COMPETENCE. Christian Nationalists want to stop abortion not because they are so hyped up about dead babies but as yet another measure how to control women as totally as they can get away with.
@vivify
Her body Her choice, in regards to abortion.
Cons hate me when I say that. Not at the expense of the tax payer though.
Tax the rich more or make them remove automation and create jobs for people. They can choose which one.
Basic medical and dental should be available like Canada has it.
Nepotism is wrong and inheritance should be taxed heavily.
No foreign ...[text shortened]... on is a cancer on the world.
Plenty of other stuff too but those are just off the top of my head.
It is a VERY long term program decades in the making to have SCOTUS kill Roe V Wade and has not stopped even now.
- Joined
- 20 Oct 06
- Moves
- 10792
@Mott-The-Hoople saidOh come on. That can't be your question.
How does OUR govt make the rest of the world comply?
It's the same way it's always worked. Treaties, alliances, accords, etc. On this particular issue, that hasn't been easy but lets at least not go backwards.
@shavixmir saidHow long did it take for you to accept mRNA vaccines use gene therapy technology? Like now I proved it to you over and over again and you still refused to believe it.
There’s no college degree “Moron”.
But, yet, here you are.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41434-024-00502-9
You must have a degree in willful ignorance. You don't want to know the truth. The truth is too hard for you to accept. So the irony of you creating a thread pretending to care about what is true is very moronic.
You also opened yourself up for ridicule. You habitually reject truth because of incredulity alone. If it sounds crazy you assume it is crazy. Sometimes the truth is crazy which you are finally finding out.
@wildgrass saidSo you are guessing Dominion doesn't like money? LOL!
I'm guessing that they didn't want to sue him.
But the evidence you shared clearly showed that there were no issues with those voting machines. The election results were not rigged in Antium County Michigan. That's the truth, based on evidence.
The same thing happened everywhere. Trump or one of Trump's allies made a wild claim about fraud, and then people looked int ...[text shortened]... you that there's an invisible, floating, incorporeal dragon that spits heatless fire in your garage?
You have 2 reports and you are choosing to believe the report you want to believe. How do you know one is true while the other is lies? You didn't see any evidence. You saw contradictory claims from 2 different sources.
YOUR CLAIM THAT IS BASED ON EVIDENCE IS NOT THE TRUTH.
YOU WOULD HAVE TO EXAMINE THE SOFTWARE TO KNOW THE TRUTH.
YOU LIED!
@sonhouse saidYou are like a broken record. You keep saying climate change is real when nobody is disputing that, but you have no evidence humans are the main cause.
If anyone deigns to marry you and you have children your grandkids are going to HATE you because climate change CAUSED BY HUMANS is real and maybe you haven't noticed the increase in wildfires lately? How many times in century 20 was there fires covering an area the size of Pennsylvania up in Canada and now fires in Washington and Pacific Palisades TOTALLY FKING DESTROYED. T ...[text shortened]... e science to say such a thing.
Or maybe he is just ANOTHER ABSOLUTE IDIOT. My vote of for IDIOT.
Al Gore lied to you and gave you a backwards cause and effect. The ice core samples proved temperatures caused CO2 levels to change, not the other way around. The whole GW movement was based on a lie about the science.
ALL of the glaciers melted during the Pliocene Epoch even though there was less CO2 back then than now. It was not CO2 because we still have glaciers, so what caused ALL the glaciers to melt back then?
@Suzianne saidSo it had nothing to do with defamation or the reputation of Dominion?
Fox was a much juicier target.
And who did more damage to their reputation? FOX or the author of the original forensics exam? Clearly the latter. And Pirro could have said that is how her opinion was formed about the election and FOX would have paid nothing to Dominion.
@wildgrass saidThey don't always work. Those agreements are violated all of the time. And first you have to convince nations around the world that man is the main cause of GW and there is no evidence for that.
Oh come on. That can't be your question.
It's the same way it's always worked. Treaties, alliances, accords, etc. On this particular issue, that hasn't been easy but lets at least not go backwards.
Explain what incentive Russia would have to go along with limiting CO2 emissions? They know about the Vostok ice core samples and how temperatures drove CO2 and methane. They know Al Gore lied about the cause and effect.
@wildgrass
You were not only lied to about the cause and effect, you were lied to about the scientific consensus too. There is no consensus and never was.
https://heartland.org/publications/research-commentary-the-myth-of-a-global-warming-consensus/
The climate change was caused by this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcanic_winter_of_536
@wildgrass saidYes, it is my question. Its telling that you can’t answer.
Oh come on. That can't be your question.
It's the same way it's always worked. Treaties, alliances, accords, etc. On this particular issue, that hasn't been easy but lets at least not go backwards.
- Joined
- 20 Oct 06
- Moves
- 10792
@Mott-The-Hoople saidIt's telling that you didn't see that I did answer the question.
Yes, it is my question. Its telling that you can’t answer.
- Joined
- 20 Oct 06
- Moves
- 10792
1 edit
@Metal-Brain said
So you are guessing Dominion doesn't like money? LOL!
You have 2 reports and you are choosing to believe the report you want to believe. How do you know one is true while the other is lies? You didn't see any evidence. You saw contradictory claims from 2 different sources.
YOUR CLAIM THAT IS BASED ON EVIDENCE IS NOT THE TRUTH.
YOU WOULD HAVE TO EXAMINE THE SOFTWARE TO KNOW THE TRUTH.
YOU LIED!
YOUR CLAIM THAT IS BASED ON EVIDENCE IS NOT THE TRUTH.
YOU WOULD HAVE TO EXAMINE THE SOFTWARE TO KNOW THE TRUTH.
YOU LIED!
Indeed, here in all caps is the crux of the thread "how to know what's true"
Because you see you've told us the election was stolen - there's a dragon in your garage. The election was stolen.
Can we see the dragon? No, it's invisible. Can we touch the dragon? No, it's incorporeal? Well surely it spits hot fire and we can feel the warmth? No, the fire is room-temperature.
The same you do with stolen elections. The evidence you provided did a deep look at the election in that one county in Michigan. Human error contributed to a small number of mis-counts, nothing that could have any chance at systematically swinging an election in someone's favor.
It was the same with the ballots that came from China, and the immigrants voting, and the Russian hackers and all the other stuff. In all caps - THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF SYSTEMATIC VOTER FRAUD TO RIG AN ELECTION.
You were told a myth, a lie, so many times that you cannot fathom it's not true.
@wildgrass saidI can see your answer will not and has never worked. Why do you think it will work this time?
It's telling that you didn't see that I did answer the question.
Do you honestly think you can trust China, India or any other countries to do the right thing?
Like here in the US, California is costing their citizens money and it’s not helping as the other states don’t go by those rules.