@AverageJoe1 saidWe all understand your question.
I read it the first time, and of course, everyone would agree with it. Why would you write all that? Was it to subvert my question? To detract Suzianne and King Herod from understanding my question? My question was not about what various organizations, civil and otherwise, think about mixing the sexes in competition.
If we have a frog-jumping contest, and someone ...[text shortened]... wed?
THESE are the questions, to you.
What in the hell did you THINK the question was, really?
Problem is, it's a stupid question.
@mike69 saidWe all see what YOU have said in this very thread.
You know what’s funny, I never hear anything from you in the other direction about language and it has happened daily from all of you as long as I can remember, didn’t you just recently tell AJ to GFY? What do you think would cool down this in your opinion allowing normal dialect? Go check sue out and shav, KD and more you pathetic weak clown.
Stop playing Miss Innocent.
@shavixmir saidBack before the far-right's brains all fell out, we heard a lot about people getting "sex changes". That's exactly what they called it back then. It's like they all forgot that sex and gender are two completely different things. This is America's curse. The dumb really do just get dumber.
Well, fine that you are such an oracle on the subject.
Blathering idiot.
They didn't agree, of course, but we never heard the amount of denial of the subject we're hearing now.
@mike69 saidAll nonsense.
It was a typo or something ai said, use your brain?
Did I mention invasion, rules and standards along with safety measures were in place for hundreds of years?
Did I mention man child and yes you do get personal sack of sht๐
Apparently not much or you sucked and never played because if you were any good u would know the huge difference that nothing could lower to a sa ...[text shortened]... d your brain can’t see that it’s in one direction only. Invasion hundreds of years. How dare you
@Suzianne saidWhy does your little buddy Maruader keep writing about what 'organizations' are doing. He is the only one here that does that. He may write about his granny apple pie recipe next.
If only.
A 'voting while stupid' law might help.
Just as Driving Under the Influence laws work, most of the time.
@mike69 saidHe is on a dart team. Can you imagine him teaming with a group? Infighting would abound.
Privacy in personal spaces let’s start there, would safety from competing against men be one? forgive me if I don’t put much stock in what a man who’s only sports experience is softball, give me a fuking break you can’t make this sht up!
@no1marauder saidHe'd written something that YOU had said. You are slipping in more ways than one, apparently. You OK, good buddy? What happened?
Did you forget this exchange from 2 pages ago?
no1: Transgender girls and women are girls and women.
Mike: No sht, do you think no one knows that๐๐
Actually, I do not recall any poster agreeing with you that a man can become a woman, or that men should play volleyball against women, etc.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidNo, he didn't; he responded to my post.
He'd written something that YOU had said. You are slipping in more ways than one, apparently. You OK, good buddy? What happened?
Actually, I do not recall any poster agreeing with you that a man can become a woman, or that men should play volleyball against women, etc.
Apparently he changed his mind two pages later.
As I've pointed out to you numerous times, 46 States allow people to change their sex on their driver's license.
@no1marauder saidso you would be ok with banning blacks from football?
I don't know how many times I have to say this:
Sports organizations should decide who can compete in their competitions.
I don't care what decision they make.
@AverageJoe1 saidthrows a pretty mean dart i hear
He is on a dart team. Can you imagine him teaming with a group? Infighting would abound.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidI'd stop watching, but philosophically no.
so you would be ok with banning blacks from football?
Probably would violate numerous Federal and State laws though.
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidWHat the heck are you talking about with these wacko and unrealistic hypotheticals that have nothing to do with the topic?
so you would be ok with banning blacks from football?
Neither Kanter Freedom nor Lia Thomas are eligible to play in the WNBA. Also, nobody on this thread watches any WNBA games. Also, no one on this thread even knows anything about how eligibility rules work in sports? The limited government folks want the government to swoop in and look up everyone's skirts?
@no1marauder saidWell, Marauder, the State of Oregon restricts local police from transferring individuals to federal immigration custody. Unbelievable.
No, he didn't; he responded to my post.
Apparently he changed his mind two pages later.
As I've pointed out to you numerous times, 46 States allow people to change their sex on their driver's license.
What is your point? Could both be stretching the law, or, could both be all OK with these positions, both of which violate some statutes and local laws, and the dictates of local governments. I would win a legal action proving that the entry on the DL is a lie. Curious : Does it say tranee, or does it just have an F for female on the license. Are they female?
Have you ever posted anything 'cut and dry', or just this lib mealy-mouth stuff?