@wildgrass said?
It seems like you're all just using girls sports as an excuse because you don't care about it but you really really want to set demands for what other people do and how they act.
Maybe this whole "free country" thing isn't for you.
I’m sorry, I do not understand your parlance. I asked three questions and y’all have never answered one of them. You speak to me as if I am being personal when this is strictly objective questioning it would be easier if you didn’t speak to me personally and look at the question , like something you might have seen on the national inquiry or something like that.
The three are GLOBAL questions.
1 edit
@wildgrass said“ There are no trans athletes in the WNBA.”
The league already concluded that he's not eligible. A ridiculous, distracting inconvenience for them. They had to issue a statement. There are no trans athletes in the WNBA.
Do their rules ban them?
If so, why?
Are trans women banned? Are they not considered women? Do you consider them as women?
@wildgrass saidYou know nothing about me…you are creating again.
Oh, you're tired? I think you're pretending. I don't believe your life has ever been negatively impacted by a trans athlete, which is why you need to make up silly and far-fetched hypotheticals to make your point about being tired of the freaks. You want them to behave differently, but they're not harming anyone.
What special treatment are you referring to?
In this case, it's the cis-gendered male basketball player who is demanding something.
No “cis gender” anything.
They are women because they said so.
Why are you against this here but for it in school sports?
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidThe rules, like any contract, are to be interpreted by what the parties intended by a "reasonable person" test.
Where in the rules is this required?
I don't think there's any real argument that what the WNBA intended was that any male could just declare themselves a woman and be eligible to play in the league. The rule obviously doesn't say that.
Kantner and the Republican politician are free to spend their own money (or maybe right wing saps like you would dig into their pockets to donate) to hire lawyers and continue their publicity stunt in court.
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidJust to help clue you in, this isn't how it works.
No “cis gender” anything.
They are women because they said so.
Simple people need simple concepts.
Even then, they get them wrong.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidAnd this forum has answered you (more than once) on this issue.
?
I’m sorry, I do not understand your parlance. I asked three questions and y’all have never answered one of them. You speak to me as if I am being personal when this is strictly objective questioning it would be easier if you didn’t speak to me personally and look at the question , like something you might have seen on the national inquiry or something like that.
The three are GLOBAL questions.
We're tired of talking to you like you were four years old.
You know, you COULD educate yourselves on this, there is plenty of info available out there (ever heard of the internet?) but you people refuse to learn anything. This is one hallmark and result of being ignorant.
@AverageJoe1 saidMaybe this whole "free country" thing isn't for you.
?
I’m sorry, I do not understand your parlance. I asked three questions and y’all have never answered one of them. You speak to me as if I am being personal when this is strictly objective questioning it would be easier if you didn’t speak to me personally and look at the question , like something you might have seen on the national inquiry or something like that.
The three are GLOBAL questions.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidMaybe this whole "free country" thing isn't for you.
“ There are no trans athletes in the WNBA.”
Do their rules ban them?
If so, why?
Are trans women banned? Are they not considered women? Do you consider them as women?
@wildgrass saidThey're too busy trying to overturn this whole "free country" thing.
Maybe this whole "free country" thing isn't for you.
It hurts their feelings.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidNow apologize to the rest of us for posting something as stupid as this.
mmmm hmmm
so does wnba violate eeoc laws with kantner and white?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidWay to backup ignorance with ignorance.
You have a habit of saying things to make you case…but the things are not true.
I gave you a chance to back up you claim, you couldn’t. As they say…you got caught
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidNon sequitur.
Just maybe we are tired of you freaks that can’t fit into normal society and demand special treatment at the expense of those that do things correctly.
Totally.
AND hypocritical.
@AverageJoe1 saidMight want to work on your definitions a bit.
WhT IN THE HELL/? Violate laws.??? Can I bring up Title IX with regard to violating the rights of a 17 yr old girl vying for a place on the Olympic Volleyball Team, only to get her face smashed in by a big strong guy?
I have bested you on every argument in this Forum
@AverageJoe1 saidWe beg you every day to make logical, coherent arguments, but you can't even manage that.
It goes without saying that you and marauder flower up every discussion by changing, not only the words but adding words and adding different concepts and different premises to an issue . That is a given.
So here you throw a post at me about professional sports when all I did was ask everyone is it OK for a man to compete with a woman, so , can you buy meanything b ...[text shortened]... ement means nothing to me in these debates because of the way you tear them to pieces and drift away
Just like Trump. I'm sure he'll be giving you a call soon to say "Well, done, faithful pet."
Wait, was that...? Ewww, gross.
@mike69 saidReality? Mike.
And these people need to go in the same padded cell as you, they should be ashamed. Very selective in their choices aren’t they. Have you heard about Britney Griner, if it is a woman why not just prove it with a test? How long were sports only real women and men, boys and girls before these frootloop changes were made?
Mike? Reality.
Now that you have been introduced, try to get along now, huh?