Go back
Looking at ICE

Looking at ICE

Debates


@KingDavid403 said
Again, it is YOU calling for death and destruction of those whom you don't agree with. Period liar. You really do have some kind of lying mental disorder. It's All the lies your child-molestor has spoon-fed you over the last 10 years of so dumb arse. lol... What an idiot...
I have not called for anyone’s death or destruction! You should limit your accusations to those things I do say instead of making them so you can call me a liar for something I did not say.


@wildgrass said
Do you think someone hired by ice with 2 weeks training armed with a gun and a bandana over his face would "obey" a command by a real law enforcement official?
What has that got to do with anything I have said?


@KellyJay said
Does one void the other, all law breaking is bad. Not just when ICE does it!
You should denounce all crime, since you claim this is the rationale, instead of ignoring ICE crimes. You can't even do it.

I would also argue that it is much worse for a crime to be committed by a govt employee being paid by taxpayers. They're being paid by us to commit crimes against us.


@KellyJay said
What has that got to do with anything I have said?
You said that we should comply with law enforcement. Only ice does not have to. They commit crimes with no accountability.

This proves that your argument is not about crime.


@wildgrass said
You said that we should comply with law enforcement. Only ice does not have to. They commit crimes with no accountability.

This proves that your argument is not about crime.
You will find something wrong with them even if you have to make it up.


@wildgrass said
You should denounce all crime, since you claim this is the rationale, instead of ignoring ICE crimes. You can't even do it.

I would also argue that it is much worse for a crime to be committed by a govt employee being paid by taxpayers. They're being paid by us to commit crimes against us.
You want to boil the ocean instead of focusing on the topic.


@KellyJay said
You want to boil the ocean instead of focusing on the topic.
You want the police to help the criminals.


@wildgrass said
You want the police to help the criminals.
Okay we are done


@KellyJay said
Okay we are done
Lol. You're done. A roving gang of masked bandits beating up citizens and you're calling it law enforcement. Joker.


@wildgrass said
Lol. You're done. A roving gang of masked bandits beating up citizens and you're calling it law enforcement. Joker.
I saw a meme that went like this: one good thing came from all of this: the left is now blaming the shooter, not the gun.

1 edit

@KellyJay said
I saw a meme that went like this: one good thing came from all of this: the left is now blaming the shooter, not the gun.
That's the dumbest meme I've ever heard.

"Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is a conservative slogan, based on the false premise that fewer guns won't cause fewer deaths.

So, are you (or this meme) trying to say that this US citizen would still have died if the officer didn't have a gun?

2 edits

@KellyJay said
I saw a meme that went like this: one good thing came from all of this: the left is now blaming the shooter, not the gun.
Oh, I think i get it now.

If Renee had a gun, then she could have defended herself against the masked assassins as they approached her vehicle?

Is that the joke? It's very funny. Pokes fun at dead people killed by law enforcement. Haha?


@KellyJay said
I saw a meme that went like this: one good thing came from all of this: the left is now blaming the shooter, not the gun.
😂


@KellyJay said
I saw a meme that went like this: one good thing came from all of this: the left is now blaming the shooter, not the gun.
I'm very much criticizing the increase in government men with guns. I remember when conservatives were obsessed with Ayn Rand who was very critical of government gunmen.


https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/physical_force.html

Ayn Rand:

Force and mind are opposites; morality ends where a gun begins. When you declare that men are irrational animals and propose to treat them as such, you define thereby your own character and can no longer claim the sanction of reason—as no advocate of contradictions can claim it. There can be no "right" to destroy the source of rights, the only means of judging right and wrong: the mind.

To force a man to drop his own mind and to accept your will as a substitute, with a gun in place of a syllogism, with terror in place of proof, and death as the final argument—is to attempt to exist in defiance of reality. Reality demands of man that he act for his own rational interest; your gun demands of him that he act against it. Reality threatens man with death if he does not act on his rational judgment; you threaten him with death if he does.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.