MAGA's: Social issues won't work

Am I reading a bunch of idiots who think illegals have rights and that the millions of illegals should have gotten trials?

Am I mistaken?

Ai

"how long in hours is the average immigration hearing to conclusion?"

An average immigration hearing to conclusion lasts between 2.5 and 4 hours, though the exact duration depends entirely on the type of hearing being held.
The actual time spent in front of a judge breaks down by the specific proceeding:
• Individual / Merits Hearings (The Trial): These are the comprehensive hearings where testimonies are given, evidence is presented, and a final decision on deportation or asylum is usually reached. They typically average 2.5 to 4 hours. If a case is highly complex or involves multiple family members, it can extend to a full 8-hour day.
• Master Calendar Hearings (Administrative): These are brief preliminary check-ins used to schedule future dates, file paperwork, or resolve basic procedural elements. They generally last only 15 minutes per person, though you may sit in a crowded courtroom for a block of 2 hours while the judge cycles through dozens of cases.
• Detention Reviews / Short-Focused Hearings: For expedited cases or fast-tracked reviews with only one or two determinative issues, hearings are generally concluded in under 2 hours.

Note: While the hearing itself is completed in a matter of hours, it often takes months or even years of backlog waiting for that specific afternoon slot to be scheduled.

"Note: While the hearing itself is completed in a matter of hours, it often takes months or even years of backlog waiting for that specific afternoon slot to be scheduled."


Millions of illegals, waiting possibly years to get their "rightful hearing" 🙄

Anyone want to do the math?

Y'all are fools.

@Suzianne

⬆️ Really big fool.

@PuzZuLz said
Am I reading a bunch of idiots who think illegals have rights and that the millions of illegals should have gotten trials?

Am I mistaken?

@AThousandYoung said
They’re corrupt because you don’t like what they do and that justifies abandoning rule of law?

Wajoma used to repeat the “no force or fraud, guvamint is bad” meme until his political allies elected a fraud who uses government force whenever he can.

Now you defend a corrupt criminal regime and talk about how you’re somehow defeating crime and corruption by doing so.

You seem to be intellectually honest most of the time. How do you reconcile this?

@Sleepyguy said
I reconcile it this way.

You're all a bunch of hypocrites. If any of you gave a sh-t about the constitution, or laws being faithfully executed, or God forbid, people living up to their oaths of office, then you would have a problem with the government funding NGO's to do what they are not allowed to do, and paying them to move illegals into and throughout the country in ...[text shortened]... ls in through every loophole we can find, in clear bad faith. Trump is just fighting fire with fire.