Originally posted by PinkFloydI know, since the abortionists don't really think the unborn are human, maybe we can convince them they are really defenseless animals. That way they may be willing to step in and give money to stop the slaughter?
I say wouldn't it be great if some computer wizard could transfer all the money that comes in responding to Sarah McGlothlin's commercial, imploring us to "be an angel for a helpless animal", and redirect it all into one of the many save the Children's Funds---maybe UNICEF? 😉
Originally posted by PinkFloydCanines (incisors) do not turn steak into edible bits, and I'd be hard pressed to actually find a person using their canines to eat. I think a study of the shape of the molars would be a better focus. Relying on your canines for an argument is kind of stupid, as people aren't lions, or wolves. I'd like to see a human take down a buffalo with their "canines", or even a sleeping cow for that matter.
one who has canine teeth for the sole purpose of ripping and tearing a good porterhouse into edible bits. 🙂
Originally posted by SJ247What makes bacteria less valuable than humans and why doesn't this apply to humans vs. other animals like cows?
I can avoid animals which might threaten my health/well-being/safety, while some viruses and bacteria are impossible to avoid, and have to be treated to prevent damage to the body.
Originally posted by SJ247Canines are not incisors. Incisors are your front teeth; canines are those pointed ones next to them. You really should learn the facts before entering a debate.
Canines (incisors) do not turn steak into edible bits, and I'd be hard pressed to actually find a person using their canines to eat. I think a study of the shape of the molars would be a better focus. Relying on your canines for an argument is kind of stupid, as people aren't lions, or wolves. I'd like to see a human take down a buffalo with their "canines", or even a sleeping cow for that matter.
Originally posted by PinkFloydExcuse me, I confused "Incisor" with "Cuspid".
Canines are not incisors. Incisors are your front teeth; canines are those pointed ones next to them. You really should learn the facts before entering a debate.
Now that the name of the tooth is clear, maybe you can actually answer the post in it's entirety, rather than picking out a minor error, and focusing on it.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraI'm not claiming humans are more or less valuable than any other living thing, I was stating that if something has the potential to make you ill, or kill you, you should take preventive measures to avoid it.
What makes bacteria less valuable than humans and why doesn't this apply to humans vs. other animals like cows?
Since you cannot physically avoid bacteria and viruses, you have to kill them with medications and chemicals, to prevent them from harming you.
Why doesn't this thought pattern apply to other animals like cows? Because I am capable of preventing a cow from harming me, by avoiding cows altogether.
Is this seriously not making sense?
Originally posted by SJ247I know some humans who are less valuable than amoebas. Now what?
I'm not claiming humans are more or less valuable than any other living thing, I was stating that if something has the potential to make you ill, or kill you, you should take preventive measures to avoid it.
Since you cannot physically avoid bacteria and viruses, you have to kill them with medications and chemicals, to prevent them from harming you.
W ...[text shortened]... g a cow from harming me, by avoiding cows altogether.
Is this seriously not making sense?
Originally posted by SJ247No, since you cannot avoid affecting cows altogether.
I'm not claiming humans are more or less valuable than any other living thing, I was stating that if something has the potential to make you ill, or kill you, you should take preventive measures to avoid it.
Since you cannot physically avoid bacteria and viruses, you have to kill them with medications and chemicals, to prevent them from harming you.
W ...[text shortened]... g a cow from harming me, by avoiding cows altogether.
Is this seriously not making sense?
Originally posted by Palynka😵
Hey! Are you calling her a cow? ðŸ˜
I'd like to add that a whole lot of bacteria are actually good and even
necessary for us, as I'm sure everyone knows. (All this about how
children growing up on farms on the countryside, exposed to all sorts of
infections are healthier and develop less allergies than children growing
up in sterile environments.)
What "the cow" [ducking 😵] says makes a lot of sense. I agree.
Not that it matters who I agree with. In fact, I may just have worsened
her cow... case!.. worsened her case.
Originally posted by JigtieI don't argue that exposure to germs is a good thing. What the hell is this thread about, exactly.
😵
I'd like to add that a whole lot of bacteria are actually good and even
necessary for us, as I'm sure everyone knows. (All this about how
children growing up on farms on the countryside, exposed to all sorts of
infections are healthier and develop less allergies than children growing
up in sterile environments.)
What "the cow" [ducking 😵] sa ...[text shortened]... who I agree with. In fact, I may just have worsened
her cow... case!.. worsened her case.