@no1marauder said“IF” a frog had wings it wouldnt bump it ass.
IF it turns out a conservative leaked it, right wingers will do a 180 degree turnaround and praise him/her for doing so.
1 edit
@moonbus saidFunny you say that, Moonbus, because the Republicans are looking to clean up in the 2022 midterms,
The Republican Party has so far come off the rails that it no longer knows what it is to govern.
and it is so obvious that many democrats are retiring out of the house, 34 of them, last I heard.
Come this Fall, if the prediction of recuring COVID is true, along with high costs for home heating fuel, the dems will get cooked, IMO
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidMaybe, with his vacuous comment 'Jan 6 again' ,, he is referring to the libs piled in front of the SOCTUS building with those damn signs they carry around like security blankets. OR, OR, OR,,,, he is referring to the maniac unhinged libs who are camped out in front the homes of the justices.
this doesnt make sense…what is your point?
Tell us libs, ( I love asking my questions, they are so good they need no answers!)./...tell us, why is it hell on earth for conservatives to vent their frustrations on Jan 6, but it is 'heaven' on earth for you libs to harass the justices At Their Homes! Amy Barrett has 7 children seeing these rabid losers.
Amass Llliberals!! Charge the court, and charge their homes!!
@no1marauder saidYou are wrong. You and I were trained to respect and apply the law. Neither of us would praise anyone, lib or conservative, for sullying the rules of SCOTUS. You insult this right (100😵 wing conservative !!!
IF it turns out a conservative leaked it, right wingers will do a 180 degree turnaround and praise him/her for doing so.
Why would you say that? Do you like this topsy turvy world.? Tell me, who is causing it, with all the signs in the street, etc? I myself have never been in a street. So, it ain't me 'a causin it.
@sh76 saidoh cool, another "leftists want everyone to earn the same, eat the same, dress the same" argument.
Nothing can or should be done to "fix" inequality.
Society has a responsibility, in my mind anyway, to try to ensure each person has a reasonable opportunity for sustenance and basic human dignity. Society should also try to protect and support those unABLE to provide and care for themselves. Beyond that, it's in all of our interests to give each person a reasonable opporuni ...[text shortened]... eople in the world. It's a reality of society anyway. It would take extreme coercion to change that.
Who says republicans don't like recycling? They recycle the same tired arguments, like they are afraid thinkin of new ones will melt the polar caps.
Hey, you know what would be a good plot twist? If this time you shock us all by telling us who wants equality in outcome. Bonus points if it's a politician i have heard of and not some communist loonie from some obscure blog
@averagejoe1 saidWhat a laugh.
You are wrong. You and I were trained to respect and apply the law. Neither of us would praise anyone, lib or conservative, for sullying the rules of SCOTUS. You insult this right (100😵 wing conservative !!!
Why would you say that? Do you like this topsy turvy world.? Tell me, who is causing it, with all the signs in the street, etc? I myself have never been in a street. So, it ain't me 'a causin it.
It turns out that there was a first leak to the Wall Street Journal that not one conservative complained about:
"The first leak was to the Wall Street Journal editorial board last week. In substance, it was that the court had voted to overrule Roe v. Wade, but that the precise outcome remains in doubt because Chief Justice John Roberts is trying to persuade either Justice Brett Kavanaugh or Justice Amy Coney Barrett to a more moderate position that would uphold the Mississippi abortion restriction without formally overturning Roe.
While not formally presented as relying on a leak, the editorial transparently does. The most obvious example is that it predicts that Alito is drafting a majority opinion to overrule Roe, but gives no explanation for that prediction and none is apparent. We now know that Alito did draft that opinion."
https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/how-the-leak-might-have-happened/
@no1marauder saidI guess the word “might” (per your link) completely escaped you didnt it?
What a laugh.
It turns out that there was a first leak to the Wall Street Journal that not one conservative complained about:
"The first leak was to the Wall Street Journal editorial board last week. In substance, it was that the court had voted to overrule Roe v. Wade, but that the precise outcome remains in doubt because Chief Justice John Roberts is trying to pe ...[text shortened]... ito did draft that opinion."
https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/how-the-leak-might-have-happened/
1 edit
@zahlanzi saidKamala Harris, our VP,, said 3 months ago that 'at the end of the day, we should all come out at the same place." Dont know how to find a link, but it is a fact.
oh cool, another "leftists want everyone to earn the same, eat the same, dress the same" argument.
Who says republicans don't like recycling? They recycle the same tired arguments, like they are afraid thinkin of new ones will melt the polar caps.
Hey, you know what would be a good plot twist? If this time you shock us all by telling us who wants equality in outcome. B ...[text shortened]... nus points if it's a politician i have heard of and not some communist loonie from some obscure blog
You have 'heard of her', mainly that she does nothing, and too, you owe me bonus points.
@mott-the-hoople saidThe "might" is referring to how the second leak happened, not to the undisputed fact that a leak occurred on the same subject a week earlier in the WSJ.
I guess the word “might” (per your link) completely escaped you didnt it?
In fact, there was an article in the Washington Post (sorry it's behind a wall) quoting "three conservative sources" close to the SCOTUS as saying that Roberts is still trying to get someone else to sign on to an opinion upholding the Arkansas law but not overrulling Roe and Casey. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/07/supreme-court-abortion-roe-roberts-alito/
@no1marauder saidI'm getting worried about Zahlanzi. Have you seen his latest?
The "might" is referring to how the second leak happened, not to the undisputed fact that a leak occurred on the same subject a week earlier in the WSJ.
In fact, there was an article in the Washington Post (sorry it's behind a wall) quoting "three conservative sources" close to the SCOTUS as saying that Roberts is still trying to get someone else to sign on to an opini ...[text shortened]... Casey. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/07/supreme-court-abortion-roe-roberts-alito/
@shavixmir saidDemocracy is quite dead in the USA . Corporations buy up politicians and they obey their masters . Both parties (RNC and DNC ) are corporations who can ignore the votes of the people and nominate anyone they choose . (Read their charters) Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for the people of the USA . Prove me wrong !
Their draft was leaked.
Hahaha
Right wing mongrels. Wanting to throw the US back 70 years. What the hell is wrong with you people?
@caissad4 saidrnc and dnc have relegated themselves power they shouldnt be able to hold
Democracy is quite dead in the USA . Corporations buy up politicians and they obey their masters . Both parties (RNC and DNC ) are corporations who can ignore the votes of the people and nominate anyone they choose . (Read their charters) Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for the people of the USA . Prove me wrong !
@caissad4 saidBeen that way for a long time, CD4. An interesting read is looking up the term lobbyist.
Democracy is quite dead in the USA . Corporations buy up politicians and they obey their masters . Both parties (RNC and DNC ) are corporations who can ignore the votes of the people and nominate anyone they choose . (Read their charters) Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for the people of the USA . Prove me wrong !
There are industrialists that will fight for the good cause, of course (like Disney) but, they make sure their bread is buttered FIRST
@mott-the-hoople saidCouldn't agree more.
rnc and dnc have relegated themselves power they shouldnt be able to hold
they have the government pay the members of the DNC and RNC,, PRIVATE organizations?? excuse me?
Hey, even when they have primaries, the government on any level should never pay for the
elections they hold, they are PRIVATE. It would be like paying the costs of the Elks club elections, for gawds sake
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople
Ah, but when TRUMP foments a REAL coup attempt THAT is WAY OK. Got it.
BTW, Trump is starting a new magazine venture, he is going to call it Maga Zine.....