@shallow-blue saidAnd an end.
She'd have accomplished not being you Republicans' God-Emperor Trump. That would've been a start.
We'd have a Republican President and a strongly Republican Congress.
We'd have ducked 4 years of ineffectual comedy for 4 years (at least) of right wing rule with a vengeance.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
1 edit
@no1marauder saidAnother example of Republican
Might be after the SCOTUS tosses out Griswold v. Connecticut; it shouldn't pass muster under Alito's tests either.
belief in ''small government.''
They wanna' reach right into your
body and your bedroom.
@no1marauder saidHillary winning would've changed the political landscape. Senators like Cruz would NOT have had the support of Trump in his narrow 2% win for reelection; in fact, his support for Trump in 2016 would've been liability, as he would've been seen as someone who debased himself to support Mr. "Pussy Tape".
Ted Cruz, somebody like him, whatever.
Hillary was unpopular in 2016 and wouldn't have been able to accomplish jack (except maybe start a war or two) with four years of Republican Congresses. Her re-election chances would have been slim to none.
In fact, Trump would've been battling legal challenges instead of supporting candidates.
That would've been two consecutive losses for president by Republicans, where anyone who supported Trump would've seemed like a shameful loser. So even *if* Hillary would've lost, other races like for the Senate would've been minus the influence of Trump.
Allowing Trump to win literally caused a movement named after him: Trumpism. There is no excuse from those holier-than-thou liberals.
1 edit
@vivify saidHa Ha Ha.
Hillary winning would've changed the political landscape. Senators like Cruz would NOT have had the support of Trump in his narrow 2% win for reelection; in fact, his support for Trump in 2016 would've been liability, as he would've been seen as someone who debased himself to support Mr. "Pussy Tape".
In fact, Trump would've been battling legal challenges instead of supp ...[text shortened]... used a movement named after him: Trumpism. There is no excuse from those holier-than-thou liberals.
Political science ain't your thing.
Trumpism was roundly thumped in 2018 and 2020; why you think it's some winning political movement is hard to fathom. On the other hand, HRC's defeat handed the Democrats the wonderful gift of being rid of her and her plentiful, unpopular baggage.
2 edits
@no1marauder saidhttps://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/600146-poll-trump-leads-biden-harris-in-2024-matchups/
Ha Ha Ha.
Political science ain't your thing.
Trumpism was roundly thumped in 2018 and 2020; why you think it's some winning political movement is hard to fathom. On the other hand, HRC's defeat handed the Democrats the wonderful gift of being rid of her and her plentiful, unpopular baggage.
Poll: Trump leads Biden, Harris in 2024 match-ups
Interesting what you consider "thumped". The same Trump who received more votes than any other sitting president in U.S. history. The same Trump who leads the incumbent in polls.
Clearly, you're no better at "political science".
@vivify saidAgain, Ha Ha Ha.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/600146-poll-trump-leads-biden-harris-in-2024-matchups/
Poll: Trump leads Biden, Harris in 2024 match-ups
Interesting what you consider "thumped". The same Trump who received more votes than any other sitting president in U.S. history. The same Trump who leads the incumbent in polls.
Clearly, you're no better at "political science".
He lost by 8 million votes.
And polls 2 and a half years before an election don't mean s**t.
2 edits
@no1marauder said8 million out of 161 million total votes. Math is not your strong suit either.
Again, Ha Ha Ha.
He lost by 8 million votes.
And polls 2 and a half years before an election don't mean s**t.
Except you just declared the end of Trumpism, which is clearly still alive, and stands to win if Trump maintains his lead.
Trump's GOP is predicted to demolish Dems in November; the same GOP that bends over backward to win Trump's endorsement; the same GOP whose politicians know their careers will end if Trump is displeased with them. So much for "thumped".
And you're the same guy who predicted over and over that Hillary would beat Trump.
1 edit
@vivify saidActually I didn't but don't let facts get in your way.
8 million out of 161 million total votes. Math is not your strong suit either.
And polls 2 and a half years before an election don't mean s**t.
Except you just declared the end of Trumpism, which is clearly still alive, and stands to win if Trump maintains his lead.
Trump's GOP is predicted to demolish Dems in November; the same GOP that bends over backward ...[text shortened]... for "thumped".
And you're the same guy who predicted over and over that Hillary would beat Trump.
A 4.5% loss for an incumbent President was petty bad considering one hadn't lost in 36 years. Moreover, Congressional Republicans did better than Trump, your rather stupid claim that the party is purely identified with the Orange Man notwithstanding.
https://www.cookpolitical.com/2020-house-vote-tracker
https://www.cookpolitical.com/2020-national-popular-vote-tracker
IF the GOP wins in November, it will because it doesn't have Trump on the ballot, just like the Dems won big in 2018 because they didn't have Hillary on that ballot. I remain rather hopeful that Republicans are dumb enough to run Trump preferred candidates like Oz, Walker and a few other lunatics in "purple" State Senate races.
What all this has to do with the actual subject of this thread is rather difficult to say.
@no1marauder saidYes, you did predict a Hillary win over and over, mocking anyone who disagreed with you; one of those people was me.
Actually I didn't but don't let facts get in your way.
A 4.5% loss for an incumbent President was petty bad considering one hadn't lost in 36 years. Moreover, Congressional Republicans did better than Trump, your rather stupid claim that the party is purely identified with the Orange Man notwithstanding.
https://www.cookpolitical.com/2020-house-vote-tracker
htt ...[text shortened]... races.
What all this has to do with the actual subject of this thread is rather difficult to say.
If the GOP wins in November, as they're heavily favored to do, it will be with candidates who all sought out Trump's endorsement. Trump is so important to winning in the GOP, that even former Trump critics like JD Vance are kissing his feet to win his endorsement.
So a party whose candidates seek out Trump's blessing are predicted to win this November in a landslide.
Yet Trumpism is "thumped". Tell me more about your "political science".
@no1marauder saida comedian LOL hard hitting there bro 😂
Great line from Jon Stewart:
"Soo ....... it appears the Supreme Court believes their opinions have a fundamental right to privacy."