@no1marauder saidYour last sentence....' explain how 'it' adds anything to security'. The IT is the presentation of the final proof of citizenship at the voting booth. It makes secure the person's vote. That 'it' adds security to the voting process.
Moron, when I move I can inform all that entities, including the Board of Elections, online right now.
Why should anyone be required to make two trips with a birth certificate when they move just to vote?
Answer that. Explain how it adds anything to voting security.
The trip with a birth certificate some time before voting is not the "it'>
@AverageJoe1 saidSpeaker of the house was asked this and he couldn't answer it either. The same gobbledy gook as you here. Why are yo having such a hard time explaining how it helps make elections more secure?
Your last sentence....' explain how 'it' adds anything to security'. The IT is the presentation of the final proof of citizenship at the voting booth. It makes secure the person's vote. That 'it' adds security to the voting process.
The trip with a birth certificate some time before voting is not the "it'>
@wildgrass saidThe question to the speaker and yours to me were to give examples of how fraudulent votingcan happen. Since he and I do not have criminal minds, he and I cannot think of one way to fool the voting process.
Speaker of the house was asked this and he couldn't answer it either. The same gobbledy gook as you here. Why are yo having such a hard time explaining how it helps make elections more secure?
And we certainly could not think of it on the spot. So you are being disingenuous to ask such a question. Give it up.
We have no hard time at all, explaining that someone who cannot prove they are a citizen should not be accepted by voting agent as qualified to vote.. This very answer to your post is the explanation.
Now, can you explain in one sentence like I did why we should not require proof of citizenship of someone who votes. Marauder has not been able to do it, kick his butt.!!
The way he and you try to get around this specific question is by answering it with saying we should not worry that a non-citizen would try to vote..
Faeries. You can’t kid a kidder.
@wildgrass saidThere are about 20 million illegals in the US, and you know for sure that none of them voted. The issue is not about who does not vote. The issue is who actually do vote, and the authorities should ensure that only citizens vote. This is currently not the case in many states.
Illegals don't vote.
Under existing federal law, voters must attest that they are U.S. citizens when registering, but are not required to provide documentary proof. Citizenship is already a legal requirement to vote, but most states don't demand documents to prove it.
Proof of citizenship which is critical apparently is not required.
As for photo ID at the polls,
- 23 states ask voters to provide photo IDs;
- 13 states accept non-photo IDs
- 14 states plus Washington D.C. don't ask voters for ID at all.
There is scope for a whole lot of voter fraud.
@Rajk999 said😆 😆 😆 😆 😆
There are about 20 million illegals in the US, and you know for sure that none of them voted. The issue is not about who does not vote. The issue is who actually do vote, and the authorities should ensure that only citizens vote. This is currently not the case in many states.
Under existing federal law, voters must attest that they are U.S. citizens when registering, bu ...[text shortened]... s Washington D.C. don't ask voters for ID at all.
There is scope for a whole lot of voter fraud.
@mike69 saidThere are documented cases where, non-citizens have voted. You have heard the parableof the hole in the Dyke.?? I think it just grew bigger or something like that. One hole two holes four holes eight holes 16 holes such as that.
Who
You are also one of the liberals who says $1 billion here and $1 billion there is no big deal.
You see, there is no stopping your largess., and that includes the number of illegals you want to vote. There are about 15 million of them, and if they all voted, that would tip the scales of our next president. To being Kamala or Buttigieg or Mamdani or… Actually, it would be a woman after this, you have no man .
@AverageJoe1 saidStill addicted to the fear.
There are documented cases where, non-citizens have voted. You have heard the parableof the hole in the Dyke.?? I think it just grew bigger or something like that. One hole two holes four holes eight holes 16 holes such as that.
You are also one of the liberals who says $1 billion here and $1 billion there is no big deal.
You see, there is no stopping your l ...[text shortened]... being Kamala or Buttigieg or Mamdani or… Actually, it would be a woman after this, you have no man .
Heil Trump.
@AverageJoe1 saidOnly if we're lucky.
There are documented cases where, non-citizens have voted. You have heard the parableof the hole in the Dyke.?? I think it just grew bigger or something like that. One hole two holes four holes eight holes 16 holes such as that.
You are also one of the liberals who says $1 billion here and $1 billion there is no big deal.
You see, there is no stopping your l ...[text shortened]... being Kamala or Buttigieg or Mamdani or… Actually, it would be a woman after this, you have no man .
@AverageJoe1 saidJust because you would do it doesn't mean everybody would.
The question to the speaker and yours to me were to give examples of how fraudulent votingcan happen. Since he and I do not have criminal minds, he and I cannot think of one way to fool the voting process.
And we certainly could not think of it on the spot. So you are being disingenuous to ask such a question. Give it up.
We have no hard time at all, explainin ...[text shortened]... should not worry that a non-citizen would try to vote..
Faeries. You can’t kid a kidder.
@AverageJoe1 saidNo, all we want is that they be able to read. You don't even want them doing that.
The const has been amended during those many years,,,,,,,we just need another amendment about just who in the hell can be a citizen of our country. This is plain english, your post here is however like double talk.
Write in plain english, it is shorter and easier to understand. You tend to want a person reading your stuff to have to decipher it, catch all the cute double entendres, etc