@AverageJoe1 saidI suspected you worked in a chip shop.
I won’t waste your time. Other fish being fried elsewhere.
@lstcyr saidIf you and I sit down and try to figure out voting and such as that to maintain a strong society, we would hardly start talking about historical facts when we have plenty to deal with with present day facts.
A remedial course in US History would help. This immigration issue is not new. This hatred of illegal people and Muslims used to be hatred of the Irish, the Italians, Asians and the Jews. In fact it’s only been in my lifetime that the hatred of Catholics has quieted down. Read about JFK’s run for the Presidency to see how Republicans used Catholic hatred against him. You are just the next wave in the hatred of the other. Think about it.
@lstcyr saidYou need to understand the scary replacement theory is not just a meme, its real. Forget that its just kharma or whatever, but European white people were to indigenous Americans the way Zionists are to Palestinians, and the great fear is that the immigrants are trying to settle the score....yeah guilt sucks when you have good reason to be paranoid.
Well, we’ve been okay with it for 250 years and there is no evidence that indicates that there has been ANY more than a minuscule amount of non-citizens voting. Even that amount is based upon the number of people actually caught and prosecuted for the crime. Why would you try to fix something that isn’t happening?
@no1marauder saidHow is it a pain in the ass to Maybe twice in your lifetime get yourself properly registered with proof of citizenship. After all we go to the grocery store 26 times a year, which, by your reasoning, would be more of a pain in the ass.???
The ones wanting to change the rules are right wingers. And they've dismally failed to show why any of these pain in the ass requirements are necessary in States that don't already have them.
But I see you are too stupid to discuss the issue rationally. so I'll stop wasting my time since all I get in response are idiotic rants like the post above.
Are you going to respond to this a simple question.
@AverageJoe1 saidYes that's the point. Thank you we agree.
Everyone see first sentence above. No one in the universe would say that “ the existence of Bigfoot is common sense”
He suggests that the definition of common sense would wrap around such a foolish statement. That is not at all what common sense is about. It is not common sense that a Bigfoot creature exist in the woods.. yes, he is not saying that… My point is the sentence itself does not make any sense.
Get with it wild grass
Bigfoot doesn't exist and non citizens do not vote in elections.
Great.
@wildgrass saidI have a hard time typing in sarcasm. Maybe I’m not meant for the forum. That is the only way you people type.
Yes that's the point. Thank you we agree.
Bigfoot doesn't exist and non citizens do not vote in elections.
Great.
Are you in effect saying that there is no need to pursue this issue, because it is IMPOSSIBLE for an unqualified person to vote?
If you are, then you are telling all of us that you know for certain that non-citizens will not be able to vote.
You see, the fallacy of your issue is that you do not know that.
So you’re sarcastic Post is quite curiious.
@AverageJoe1 saidNo not impossible. But it's also not a real problem.
I have a hard time typing in sarcasm. Maybe I’m not meant for the forum. That is the only way you people type.
Are you in effect saying that there is no need to pursue this issue, because it is IMPOSSIBLE for an unqualified person to vote?
If you are, then you are telling all of us that you know for certain that non-citizens will not be able to vote.
You s ...[text shortened]... fallacy of your issue is that you do not know that.
So you’re sarcastic Post is quite curiious.
@wildgrass saidSo you think something that has never been proven like Bigfoot, the tooth fairy, and having no evidence they do is a good comparison in saying if given the opportunity we know that humans never cheat unless we have evidence?
What cheating liberals? You're saying Bigfoot exists without evidence of anything. In the last election, more trump supporters committed voter fraud than liberals.
I gave you a list of numerous suspicious things from the last election, hell it’s coming out Obama and the dems did it to Trump?
@wildgrass saidYou don’t know anything except saying your opinions is truth because your party tells you that. Tell me why are you against making them safer it protects everyone not just us????????
No not impossible. But it's also not a real problem.
1 edit
@mike69 saidThere is a website that tracks these things and the type of fraud being discussed here is in the single digits and hardly enough to even come close to deciding elections and certainly not anything that is remotely in the range of concern that we would want to consider new laws to disenfranchise voters.
So you think something that has never been proven like Bigfoot, the tooth fairy, and having no evidence they do is a good comparison in saying if given the opportunity we know that humans never cheat unless we have evidence?
I gave you a list of numerous suspicious things from the last election, hell it’s coming out Obama and the dems did it to Trump?
It's a fake problem with harmful solutions.
1 edit
@wildgrass saidDo you not realize how ignorant that comment is, are you going to Answer my questions, they’re very simple. Go back and read slowly, and understand there is no way possible to know what you just post. It only shows what’s been found.
There is a website that tracks these things and the type of fraud being discussed here is in the single digits and hardly enough to even come close to deciding elections and certainly not anything that is remotely in the range of concern that we would want to consider new laws to disenfranchise voters.
It's a fake problem with harmful solutions.
@wildgrass
Even using your party logic would that not be cheating that’s been caught? Should we close these loopholes?