1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidThis BS isn't answering my question, is it?
Do you feel just a little bit, just a little bit, just a little bit, like a fool and a dupe to continue using that word suppress.? You did not exactly make it up. So tell us where you got that word suppressed from that you are copping from someone else.???
Can you speak for yourself??
And tell all of the losers that read your posts about how someone who is too o ...[text shortened]... rements!?!?!? To make it more comfortable for them?!?!?!?
Your posts truly get worse by the day
That's because you can't.
Just to remind you of the question you're dodging:
"Why should anyone be required to make two trips with a birth certificate when they move just to vote?
Answer that. Explain how it adds anything to voting security."
The post that was quoted here has been removedThanks for covering Sue, Mike. We have our hands full over here. Also watch out for some Sunhouse Post if you could, if you could handle that as well.
You are a trooper. You should have no trouble with Sue, all of hers are one liners, and as she does not debate, they will be simple to throw off.
2 edits
@AverageJoe1 saidBipolar, after three post messing with me?😁
Thanks for covering Sue, Mike. We have our hands full over here. Also watch out for some Sunhouse Post if you could, if you could handle that as well.
You are a trooper. You should have no trouble with Sue, all of hers are one liners, and as she does not debate, they will be simple to throw off.
I wonder what they think about Obama cheating in elections?
https://www.youtube.com/live/0yyHx9eXAtY?si=k9giGUOKfb5vyxx5
@AverageJoe1 saidWhat have you "debated" here? You've refused to even discuss any of the requirements of the SAVE Act and appear to be too stupid to understand that IF birthright citizenship is ended (which you support) a birth certificate won't be proof of citizenship.
Thanks for covering Sue, Mike. We have our hands full over here. Also watch out for some Sunhouse Post if you could, if you could handle that as well.
You are a trooper. You should have no trouble with Sue, all of hers are one liners, and as she does not debate, they will be simple to throw off.
You just babble out what you have been told by propaganda outlets absent any bit of independent thought or analysis.
@wildgrass saidEveryone see first sentence above. No one in the universe would say that “ the existence of Bigfoot is common sense”
Insane..That's like saying the existence of Bigfoot is common sense.
If there is a hole surely you can show it, no?
People in Oregon have been voting mail in for decades without issue. I don't see the hole.
He suggests that the definition of common sense would wrap around such a foolish statement. That is not at all what common sense is about. It is not common sense that a Bigfoot creature exist in the woods.. yes, he is not saying that… My point is the sentence itself does not make any sense.
Get with it wild grass
@no1marauder said?si=gGsGNoeTNX88Ibx6
What have you "debated" here? You've refused to even discuss any of the requirements of the SAVE Act and appear to be too stupid to understand that IF birthright citizenship is ended (which you support) a birth certificate won't be proof of citizenship.
You just babble out what you have been told by propaganda outlets absent any bit of independent thought or analysis.
@no1marauder saidUhhh(everyone) Mrdr, can you state the question, using your own words ? And if you use the word suppressed, give us its definition and apply it the issue at hand? There’s a good chap.
This BS isn't answering my question, is it?
That's because you can't.
No links please unless you would like to post the definition of suppression …can’t wait
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 said"Why should anyone be required to make two trips to a government office with a birth certificate when they move just to vote?
Uhhh(everyone) Mrdr, can you state the question, using your own words ? And if you use the word suppressed, give us its definition and apply it the issue at hand? There’s a good chap.
No links please unless you would like to post the definition of suppression …can’t wait
Answer that. Explain how it adds anything to voting security."
In NY now, "The online registration portal or the voter registration form can be used to change a name or address." https://elections.ny.gov/voter-registration-process
@no1marauder saidI have never discussed birthright on any thread. If you want to write about birthright, start a thread about it. You may have pontificated as your usual method, about birth rights, but I have not joined in on any such conversation. Bring it.
What have you "debated" here? You've refused to even discuss any of the requirements of the SAVE Act and appear to be too stupid to understand that IF birthright citizenship is ended (which you support) a birth certificate won't be proof of citizenship.
You just babble out what you have been told by propaganda outlets absent any bit of independent thought or analysis.
Everyone has touched on the constitutional provision that slaves’ children’s have birth rights, which I have read about and written about with you, but we have never discussed presently birthright. I think Congress and Senate of taking that up right now.
Bring it. Before you do, be somewhat real like a human and realize that things are different now than 250 years ago. Do you think that Madison and Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin and button Gwinnett could have envisioned the world today , and had they , do you think they might have written something different? That is a strong question for marauder.
@Rajk999 saidIt doesn’t help that you don’t listen or read.
So the law is not being followed. Miniscule is a matter of opinion. Something like voting is a critical matter that should not be left up to state law. That should be federal law and the same across the board for all states. Nobody conducts business without proper ID. Apparently only in the US ...
Apart from AvJoe there are credible reports from reputable sources that h ...[text shortened]... of citizenship with a photo ID. If that creates 'barriers', then it should be enforced regardless.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou're lying again. You support the Trump position that birthright citizenship is not required by the Constitution despite the clear language of the 14th Amendment.
I have never discussed birthright on any thread. If you want to write about birthright, start a thread about it. You may have pontificated as your usual method, about birth rights, but I have not joined in on any such conversation. Bring it.
Everyone has touched on the constitutional provision that slaves’ children’s have birth rights, which I have read about and w ...[text shortened]... , do you think they might have written something different? That is a strong question for marauder.
And what none of you dunces seem to understand is that IF the SCOTUS validates that position, a birth certificate would no longer be an adequate proof of citizenship. So as I already stated, this administration is insisting that voters have to show a birth certificate to register to vote and make any changes to that registration while at the same time supporting a legal position that would make that document useless as proof of citizenship.
That's pretty strange, don't you think?