Go back
should this man be arrested?

should this man be arrested?

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down


@sh76 said
I don't think I left that out, but what imminent violence was likely based on the speech?
BLM has a track record of burning and destruction

1 edit

@sh76 said
Encouraging violence is still protected by the First Amendment.
NO IT IS NOT.
You can't possibly have gone to college.


@Earl-of-Trumps said
This is one thread that @No1Marauder won't be posting in.
i trust him more to be consistent than i trust you


@Mott-The-Hoople said
"But the most chilling behavior arguably came from Hawk Newsome, who founded BLM of Greater New York. Newsome went before the national media and uttered what could be regarded as a chilling threat.



Newsome called for ‘black vigilantes’ to be unleashed on the public and seemingly suggested they could kill white people for running their mouths. He then said black ...[text shortened]... ns.



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/here-we-go-blm-leader-appears-threaten-violence/
he is a dumbass, and a dangerous one at that. Don't know if he crossed the legal lines into "send him to jail".

Let's say "do to him exactly what you would do to Trump for all the times he incited violence "


@Cliff-Mashburn said
NO IT IS NOT.
You can't possibly have gone to college.
Right wingers here are uneducated, stubborn idiots. From the case SH cited:

"Freedoms of speech and press do not permit a State to forbid advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action."

Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 US 444 (1969)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/#tab-opinion-1948083


@no1marauder said
Right wingers here are uneducated, stubborn idiots. From the case SH cited:

"Freedoms of speech and press do not permit a State to forbid advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action."

Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 US 444 (1969)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/#tab-opinion-1948083
YOU CAN'T THREATEN PEOPLE AND HIDE BEHIND THE 1ST AMENDMENT.


@Cliff-Mashburn said
YOU CAN'T THREATEN PEOPLE AND HIDE BEHIND THE 1ST AMENDMENT.
it's hilarious how 2 lawyers on this very thread, one of which is a conservative republican, told you he is within the boundaries of legality, and you STILL vomit stupidity 😀



i wish we had a mute button so we hide all posts from the special people. the forums would look so much cleaner


@Mott-The-Hoople said
"But the most chilling behavior arguably came from Hawk Newsome, who founded BLM of Greater New York. Newsome went before the national media and uttered what could be regarded as a chilling threat.



Newsome called for ‘black vigilantes’ to be unleashed on the public and seemingly suggested they could kill white people for running their mouths. He then said black ...[text shortened]... ns.



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/here-we-go-blm-leader-appears-threaten-violence/
"What could be argued..." "seemingly suggested"...

The spin is great with this one!

1 edit

@Cliff-Mashburn said
YOU CAN'T THREATEN PEOPLE AND HIDE BEHIND THE 1ST AMENDMENT.
Well, here's what he said according to the right wing NY Post (which erroneously referred to him as a "BLM leader" ):

"“Everybody else has vigilantes. We need some black vigilantes,” he told the crowd, according to the DailyMail. “People want to jump up and choke us and kill us for being loud, how about we do the same when they attempt to oppress us,” he said.

“So, f—k America. How dare you laugh and cheer when someone gets away with murdering us,” Newsome concluded. “Racists: burn in hell.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/crime/general/jordan-neely-s-father-blm-leader-hawk-newsome-lament-daniel-penny-acquittal-in-subway-chokehold-death-the-system-is-rigged/ar-AA1vyazY?ocid=BingNewsSerp

I see no threats, no call for lawless action and certainly nothing suggesting anything "imminent".


@Earl-of-Trumps said
you judge them by what they DO, not what they say
zzzzzzzzzzz Jan6 zzzzzzzzzzzzzz


@Mott-The-Hoople said
how many blacks has BLM helped? they get b=millions/ billions of dollars but I cant find any poor family they have helped. only their higher ups buying mansions
Buy Lavish Mansions.

1 edit

@no1marauder said
Well, here's what he said according to the right wing NY Post (which erroneously referred to him as a "BLM leader" ):

"“Everybody else has vigilantes. We need some black vigilantes,” he told the crowd, according to the DailyMail. “People want to jump up and choke us and kill us for being loud, how about we do the same when they attempt to oppress us,” he said.

“So, ...[text shortened]...
I see no threats, no call for lawless action and certainly nothing suggesting anything "imminent".
so you dont consider killing someone because the killed one of you is not a threat or a suggestion to kill?

Did he mean to protest peacefully? Well if you had included ALL he said you would have the answer…no.

What hawk newsome said in its entirety..,


“Like everybody else has vigilantes, we need some black vigilantes,” Newsome said. “People want to jump up and choke us and kill us for being loud, how about we do the same when they attempt to oppress us? I’m tired. I know you’re looking for us to be like ‘oh, go and march. Go and march.’ No, this weekend, I want you to hold a community event, everywhere from the Bronx, to Houston, to Seattle, to Florida. Black people hold community events and talk about what you need.”

what do you think he meant by that?


@Zahlanzi said
he is a dumbass, and a dangerous one at that. Don't know if he crossed the legal lines into "send him to jail".

Let's say "do to him exactly what you would do to Trump for all the times he incited violence "
quote Trump on inciting violence…I await your response.


@Zahlanzi said
it's hilarious how 2 lawyers on this very thread, one of which is a conservative republican, told you he is within the boundaries of legality, and you STILL vomit stupidity 😀



i wish we had a mute button so we hide all posts from the special people. the forums would look so much cleaner
what is hillarious is you mistaking google for lawyers.😂