@Mott-The-Hoople saidYou must be confusing me with someone else; I've never supported the abolition of national borders.
as expected he now says he was against US open borders...that is after claiming ALL borders should be eliminated. The same as he believes there are no different races but will call someone racist.
must be torture living his life.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidTwo maggot morons discussing a very intelligent man. Don't hurt yourselves.
as expected he now says he was against US open borders...that is after claiming ALL borders should be eliminated. The same as he believes there are no different races but will call someone racist.
must be torture living his life.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidI'm not sure what you are talking about; AFAIK "twelvers" are a branch of Shiite Muslims who would have zero influence in the West Bank and Gaza which is 98% Sunni Muslim.
at what point do you or 76 mention the muslim jihadist, twelvers if you will, using the people of west bank and gaza to further their plans of destruction. its strange to me how you both just ignore this.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidDo you think he is following these posts, could he possibly respond like a gentleman and explain himself?
as expected he now says he was against US open borders...that is after claiming ALL borders should be eliminated. The same as he believes there are no different races but will call someone racist.
must be torture living his life.
Why be so disingenuous. I just stated an hour ago that we should get rid of Mitch McConnell. There’s nothing disingenuous about me. What is Marauder’s problem??
Must have been raised by his grandmother or an aunt!
@no1marauder saidSuzianne? Is he lying??????
You must be confusing me with someone else; I've never supported the abolition of national borders.
@sh76 said"In all seriousness, you think Israelis are marching into Palestinian cities and taking over their houses?"
My friends making payments on million dollar mortgages in Israel would appreciate guidance on how to get these free houses. Do you have any?
In all seriousness, you think Israelis are marching into Palestinian cities and taking over their houses? Israelis aren't even ALLOWED in Palestinian cities by ISRAELI law. I've seen the big red signs forbidding Israelis from going anywh ...[text shortened]... ties.
Where Israelis do live in the West Bank, they built new villages on previously empty areas.
at this point i would ask what palestinian cities or houses are left standing. but yes. that's exactly what they did. documented
"Israelis aren't even ALLOWED in Palestinian cities by ISRAELI law. "
funny way to phrase that. I would phrase it as "palestinians are losing more and more land they could call their own, which becomes ISRAELI land. By ISRAELI law.
"Where Israelis do live in the West Bank, they built new villages on previously empty areas."
At this point, anyone showing this kind of ignorance has to be the world's dumbest ostrich.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou better put trumps name on your house or dump is going to demo it. Hurry up!
Suzianne? Is he lying??????
@no1marauder saidIgnorant…
I'm not sure what you are talking about; AFAIK "twelvers" are a branch of Shiite Muslims who would have zero influence in the West Bank and Gaza which is 98% Sunni Muslim.
“Twelver Sunnism is a religious inclination within Sunni Islam, where, alongside belief in the first three caliphs, the guardianship of the Imams of the Shi'a is also respected and believed. It is said that the foundation for this inclination was laid in the very early centuries, in contrast to the advocates of Uthman, who opposed Imam Ali (a). However, it became more prevalent from the sixth/twelfth century, initially in Iran and India, and subsequently in the eastern regions of Greater Khorasan and the territories of the Ottoman Caliphate.
The term "Twelver Sunnism" is a new terminology used in contemporary historical studies. However, some researchers cite a manuscript dating back to the late Safavid era, indicating that the Persian equivalent of the term (Tasannun Dawazdah-Imami) was already in use in Iran during that period. Factors contributing to the formation of Twelver Sunnism include the collapse of the Abbasid Caliphate, the religious tolerance of the Mongol Ilkhanates and Timurid rulers, the growth of Sufism and the authority of Sufis, and the proximity of Sufism and Shiism.
Researchers of history believe that a key reason behind the prevalence of Shiism in the Islamic East, particularly in Iran, and the foundation for the formation of the Shi'a Safavid government was Twelver Sunnism. According to them, the presence of governments adhering to Twelver Sunnism throughout the ninth/fifteenth and tenth/sixteenth centuries prepared the ground for the religious transformation of Iranians from Sunnism to Shiism. Additionally, the existence of various cultural figures inclined to Twelver Sunnism, who in their works mentioned the Imams of the Shi'a as infallible divine authorities alongside the three caliphs, also contributed to this religious change in Iran.”
https://en.wikishia.net/view/Twelver_Sunnism
@Mott-The-Hoople saidLMAO! Nice try but such a concept has been extinct for hundreds of years. From AI:
Ignorant…
“Twelver Sunnism is a religious inclination within Sunni Islam, where, alongside belief in the first three caliphs, the guardianship of the Imams of the Shi'a is also respected and believed. It is said that the foundation for this inclination was laid in the very early centuries, in contrast to the advocates of Uthman, who opposed Imam Ali (a). However, i ...[text shortened]... also contributed to this religious change in Iran.”
https://en.wikishia.net/view/Twelver_Sunnism
" "Twelver Sunnism" does not exist because Twelver and Sunnism are two entirely different, separate branches of Islam
.Here is the breakdown of why this term is a contradiction:
Twelver (Ithna Ashari): This is the largest branch of Shia Islam. Twelvers believe in a lineage of 12 divine imams chosen by God, starting with Ali ibn Abi Talib
.Sunnism: This is the largest overall branch of Islam. Sunnis do not follow the Shia concept of the 12 Imams, instead recognizing the historical Caliphs (starting with Abu Bakr) as the political successors to the Prophet Muhammad.
Because these represent the two main opposing theological frameworks in Islamic history, combining them into one term is incorrect."