@metal-brainsaid He already has a congressman from the house. All he needs is one Senator and he has the floor. Not that difficult to accomplish at all.
And then he gets a delay of two hours. Two hours discussion time where the houses meet separately, and then decide whether to accept the objection. In the end, both houses have to vote to accept any objections to the count. Trump does not get the floor to press his case. All this will do is result in a delay in the proceedings, as the House will not accept objections to the certified electoral vote counts.
@metal-brainsaid Never implied there was.
This is about evidence, not opinion of the partisan biased.
You said he had no evidence because you never heard any. I'm letting you know he finally will be able to do it, all he needs is one senator to side with him and he has 2 hours on the floor to do it and the news media will find it very hard to ignore without it being obvious.
So if he gets his senator which I’m sure he has, he’s a wormy little turd who’s fancies himself as Trump.2 and he still cannot produce any evidence will you apologise for your post election lies about widespread voter fraud changing the result of the election?
In which of the court cases did Trump even try to present anything which could be counted as shadow of the illusion of something that remotely looks like evidence?
How many judges have specifically asked for it? And now you claim that the courts did not want to hear that 😲
@ponderablesaid In which of the court cases did Trump even try to present anything which could be counted as shadow of the illusion of something that remotely looks like evidence?
How many judges have specifically asked for it? And now you claim that the courts did not want to hear that 😲
A court rejected Trump's case because of merit instead of standing? Which court was that?
@kevcvs57said So if he gets his senator which I’m sure he has, he’s a wormy little turd who’s fancies himself as Trump.2 and he still cannot produce any evidence will you apologise for your post election lies about widespread voter fraud changing the result of the election?
Trump already has plenty of evidence. The Epoch Times did a documentary with lots of it. It is free to watch.
@suziannesaid And then he gets a delay of two hours. Two hours discussion time where the houses meet separately, and then decide whether to accept the objection. In the end, both houses have to vote to accept any objections to the count. Trump does not get the floor to press his case. All this will do is result in a delay in the proceedings, as the House will not accept objections to the certified electoral vote counts.
@metal-brainsaid He already has a congressman from the house. All he needs is one Senator and he has the floor. Not that difficult to accomplish at all.
@metal-brainsaid A court rejected Trump's case because of merit instead of standing? Which court was that?
What is your source of information?
Please! You can't be serious. be so nice to show one piece of credible evidence or just show in which of the about 60 cases teh Trump camapaign lost the judge did not want to hear evidence.
I found after about 30 seconds of googling the following site, in which the courts' decision is shown (it seems that the link to the pdf is corrupted however):
@Metal-Brain Why don't you do your own search? You are one lazy dude.
If you had been watching anything besides Newsmax and Fox that would have been explained.
You are desperately hoping those idiots doing the objecting will actually accomplish something.
Don't hold your breath.
That senator doing the objecting, or at least SAYING he is objecting, is doing a blatant circus act for the purpose of having Trump's base notice him so he will have what he thinks as street cred for his upcoming 2024 POTUS run.
The courts did not refuse to hear evidence. Trump’s legal team didn’t present any.
January 6 is nothing to do with presenting evidence; it’s a formal certification of the EC vote. The EC has spoken, it’s a done deal. One senator and one representative have no authority to overturn an election.
@ponderablesaid Please! You can't be serious. be so nice to show one piece of credible evidence or just show in which of the about 60 cases teh Trump camapaign lost the judge did not want to hear evidence.
I found after about 30 seconds of googling the following site, in which the courts' decision is shown (it seems that the link to the pdf is corrupted however):
https://lawandcrime ...[text shortened]... ve to retype this.
Now it is your turn to show any shred of evidence (facebook links don't count)
Trump attempted to change how Clark County is processing mail-in ballots in the final days of the election. That is not an election fraud claim.
@metal-brainsaid Trump attempted to change how Clark County is processing mail-in ballots in the final days of the election. That is not an election fraud claim.
Trump team: specific evidence on Jan. 6th
31 Dec '20 14:441 edit
Back to Top