Originally posted by generalissimo
social democracy is without a doubt a left-wing ideal, ultimately its objective is the distribution of wealth through government programs, do you deny this?
This is nonsensical, simplistic silliness. "Left-wing"
from what? Social democracy embraces "right wingism" and "left wingism" and "centrism" and it can even accommodate "far right" and "far left" politics too. What it
isn't, is authoritarian or oligarchical, and so forth.
You want to pose absurd questions that rinse all meaning out of the already beleaguered terminology describing the political spectrum, then go ahead. I have now answered your daft little reductionist question repeatedly.
For me personally, social democracy is more about equality of opportunity, the tackling of injustice, and the mechanisms of democratic participation, rather than redistribution of wealth in the ordinary sense of that expression. I am highly ambivalent towards programmes involving cash payments to the less well off to compensate for inequity. I am more interested in investment in things like social capital than in the often crude attempted engineering of 'handouts'.
On the other hand when the discussion is about empowering the individual and groups of citizens through the provision of education and training, preventative health care, equal footing in the eyes of the law, and protecting citizens from predatory or power concentrating corporatism, then my 'social democrat' ears prick up. Really, for all intents and purposes, my politics are not so wildly different from the likes of sh76 or USArmyParatrooper or DrKF.
This all makes me pretty much a centrist or centre-left in the real world, which of course is not the world that your heel-yapping plastic pantsery is addressing.
Like them or love them, my 'social democratic' world is or has been populated by the likes of Blair, Bush II, Merkel, Thatcher, all Japanese PMs since 1945, Sarkosy, Berlusconi, Uribe, PMs and presidents across the world in every country that isn't ruled by tyranny of some kind. Insinuate that they are all "left-wingers" if you want, but in terms of engaging in joined-up debate, it's like you turning up in France with a British electrical plug.
To call me "far left" has about as much credence as calling me "unintelligent" or "illiterate" or a "hermaphrodite" or a "well known proven liar" or other limp, meaningless insults that pass for superficial
badass debating round here.