14 Nov '18 00:11>1 edit
@no1marauder saidIt is a crime, but you have too prove it. Indictments are not proof as you well know. The news media largely ignores Debbie W. Shultz considering her intent to conspire against Sanders to swing the primary elections in HRC's favor. It should have been a huge scandal. Same thing with Donna Brazile e-mailing the debate questions to John Podesta and Jennifer Palmieri . She even said she didn't regret it. Very unethical! Thank you wikileaks.
Whether it affected the elections is unknowable; info from it was certainly used in the campaign to discredit the DNC. And while you keep wanting to ignore this, hacking into someone's computers is a crime and knowingly trying to benefit from that crime is also a crime as is lying about your knowledge of it to federal investigators.
What info about Carter Page in the d ...[text shortened]... he went to Moscow and met with Russian officials there about a month after the Trump Tower meeting.
From the link below:
"Some press accounts have treated the dossier’s allegation that Russian officials offered Trump adviser Carter Page billions to end US sanctions as confirmed in September 2016 reporting by Yahoo News’ Michael Isikoff. But Isikoff’s “Western intelligence source” was almost surely the dossier itself. So the media used the dossier to corroborate the dossier. (Page, who has repeatedly denied under oath he met with the Russian officials cited in the dossier, is suing Yahoo News over the Isikoff story.)
What doesn’t check out at all, though, is the dossier’s most serious charge: that Trump officials secretly met with Kremlin officials overseas to hatch the hacking scheme against the Clinton campaign."
Using the dossier to dossier to corroborate the dossier. Whoever did that is pathetic!