Go back
What if photo IDs are available for all citizens tomorrow?!?

What if photo IDs are available for all citizens tomorrow?!?

Debates

1 edit

@AverageJoe1 said
Your last question will be ‘laughed at’ by everyone who gets the gist of that old loaded question… “Are you still beating your wife ?” Your question assumes that something damaging is already true🤣!!


Ohhh Sue, disingenuosity runs deep.
No, fool, it IS already true, and thus makes a fool of you.


You need a review of cause and effect.


And "English, mofo, do you speak it?!"

Disingenuosity is not a word. Around these parts we just call it "lying". I'm sure you're familiar.


@AverageJoe1 said
I’m not lazy about links…. I just have this aversion, in a debate, to listen to something that someone else has said or written. If I ask Sunhouse a question, I don’t want him to post something that you said in answer to my question. I don’t want you to post a link from someone in Washington DC in answer to my question to you. Thank you very much. Whew.
If you want to be taken seriously, you should take your own advice.

God, it's like everyone on the right has turned into that slow kid in class. Everything has to stop so the teacher makes sure everyone gets the lesson.


@no1marauder said
Since you're too lazy to read links:

"In every form, the SAVE Act would require American citizens to show documents like a passport or birth certificate to register to vote. Our research shows that more than 21 million Americans lack ready access to those documents. Roughly half of Americans don’t even have a passport. Millions lack access to a paper copy of the ...[text shortened]... had my records which included my signature every time I voted (which has been for almost 50 years).
Now, to your question….,
Libs naturally think that everything should be free and easy. To follow through with your logic, let us make it as easy as possible, which makes it easier for bad people to do bad things.
That sort of summarizes my entire logic. What is yours?
And what would be your response if I asked you?(you won’t) if there is a chance that one democrat or more want there to be ease of elections so that illegal people can vote on the leader of the free world.


@Suzianne said
Ink?

Are you an idiot?
Sorry, forgot to not employ nuance. I should have said typing a lot of letters on the forum page


@AverageJoe1 said
Now, to your question….,
Libs naturally think that everything should be free and easy. To follow through with your logic, let us make it as easy as possible, which makes it easier for bad people to do bad things.
That sort of summarizes my entire logic. What is yours?
And what would be your response if I asked you?(you won’t) if there is a chance that one democrat o ...[text shortened]... want there to be ease of elections so that illegal people can vote on the leader of the free world.
'"Leader of the free world" is a Cold War-era term referring to the President of the United States as the symbolic, moral, and military leader of democratic, capitalist nations opposing authoritarian regimes. It implies that the US president dictates foreign policy for Western-aligned nations. ' (Our AI friend).


Those days are long gone. Wake up and smell the coffee.


@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
'"Leader of the free world" is a Cold War-era term referring to the President of the United States as the symbolic, moral, and military leader of democratic, capitalist nations opposing authoritarian regimes. It implies that the US president dictates foreign policy for Western-aligned nations. ' (Our AI friend).


Those days are long gone. Wake up and smell the coffee.
You have got to be kidding. So who then would you say is the most important leader in the ‘world’?🌎


@AverageJoe1 said
You have got to be kidding. So who then would you say is the most important leader in the ‘world’?🌎
Define 'important.'

America is clearly the most powerful, but you have given up your mantle as any kind of moral torch leading the way.


@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Define 'important.'

America is clearly the most powerful, but you have given up your mantle as any kind of moral torch leading the way.
Define what you mean by this?

President of the United States as the symbolic, moral, and military leader of democratic, capitalist nations opposing authoritarian regimes

Follow with why you find removal of Maduro etc to be immoral. Oh, and ending eight wars. You fellas never bring that up. You also never use words like self alliance, independence liberty such as that. All of your posts are like one person.
Nothing reams long and protracted, I get enough of that from Moroder


@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Define 'important.'

America is clearly the most powerful, but you have given up your mantle as any kind of moral torch leading the way.
Is UK jealous? More than half of the posters on this forum could not name your Prime Minister.


@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Define 'important.'

America is clearly the most powerful, but you have given up your mantle as any kind of moral torch leading the way.
Exactly.

1 edit

@AverageJoe1 said
Define what you mean by this?

President of the United States as the symbolic, moral, and military leader of democratic, capitalist nations opposing authoritarian regimes

Follow with why you find removal of Maduro etc to be immoral. Oh, and ending eight wars. You fellas never bring that up. You also never use words like self alliance, independence liberty such as tha ...[text shortened]... posts are like one person.
Nothing reams long and protracted, I get enough of that from Moroder
Still can't read, eh?

Because he didn't "end 8 wars". Don't be stupid.


@AverageJoe1 said
You have got to be kidding. So who then would you say is the most important leader in the ‘world’?🌎
Nobody.

Why do you think the UN, the EU and NATO exist?

1 edit

@Suzianne said
Nobody.

Why do you think the UN, the EU and NATO exist?
Hey, you’ll appreciate this. All of the Olympic athletes who are being interviewed, who are sliming the United States of America, their own country, seemed to have a gay air about them. And then you have Gavin Newsom, and AOC over at the Munich conference sliming the United States just like these people who disparage their country. Like you do.
Last year JD Vance went to that same meeting and called out the Europeans for failing to uphold some of the most basichuman principles, such as freedom of speech.
Now you have Newsome and AOC sliming of America and groveling for attention. Is that why they are there? Wow, what great USA ambassadors? And what are all of your cousins and brothers doing in California with the horrible mess it is in, while Newsom is over there getting his hair done in Europe.?


@AverageJoe1
People that are too dumb to get an ID shouldn't be voting anyway....


@AverageJoe1 said
Define what you mean by this?

President of the United States as the symbolic, moral, and military leader of democratic, capitalist nations opposing authoritarian regimes

Follow with why you find removal of Maduro etc to be immoral. Oh, and ending eight wars. You fellas never bring that up. You also never use words like self alliance, independence liberty such as tha ...[text shortened]... posts are like one person.
Nothing reams long and protracted, I get enough of that from Moroder
Trump is not a moral, truthful or stable leader.

Do you require further clarification?