Go back
What is Mass Formation Psychosis?

What is Mass Formation Psychosis?

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
I came to realize that those that dismissed Mass Formation Psychosis as conspiracy theory nonsense do not know what it is.

https://www.swfinstitute.org/news/90470/what-is-mass-formation-psychosis

If you are going to be in denial, at least be informed about what you are denying. Reality.
Yes I can see you do enjoy "posting relevant excerpts"

1 edit

@metal-brain said
Yes it is.

https://hms.harvard.edu/news/gene-vaccine

You are experiencing psychosis, There has been some loss of contact with reality with you. Do you honestly think Harvard Medical School is lying when they call them gene vaccines?
More MB "posting relevant excerpts"

Eh, enough wasting time on you. Those who might be following this exchange can see where truth lies.

1 edit

@athousandyoung said
More MB "posting relevant excerpts"

Eh, enough wasting time on you. Those who might be following this exchange can see where truth lies.
What is the title to the article?

Gene vaccine

Here is an excerpt:

"The AAVCOVID vaccine program is a gene-based vaccine strategy based on an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector"

Here is another:

"Vaccination with AAVCOVID delivers genetic sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein—the characteristic protuberances on the coronavirus that it uses to enter host cells—so the body can develop an immune response to the virus."

Viral vector vaccines are gene vaccines. Do you dispute that? Yes or no?


@metal-brain said
What is the title to the article?

Gene vaccine

Here is an excerpt:

"The AAVCOVID vaccine program is a gene-based vaccine strategy based on an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector"

Here is another:

"Vaccination with AAVCOVID delivers genetic sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein—the characteristic protuberances on the coronavirus that it uses to enter hos ...[text shortened]... response to the virus."

Viral vector vaccines are gene vaccines. Do you dispute that? Yes or no?
For fukk’s sake.

Your mistake in reasoning has been pointed out to you so often, I just want to kick your teeth out your face.

Have you emailed them yet?


@athousandyoung said
Gene vaccines are not the same as gene therapy. There is no biological mechanism for mRNA to modify DNA except via the reverse transcriptase enzyme found in retroviruses. Without DNA modification there is no gene therapy.

It’s kind of like trying to modify a document on your hard drive by feeding hard copy printed paper documents into the printer. It doesn’t work like that.

You need a scanner to do that (reverse transcriptase).
So you admit they are called gene vaccines.

That is how all of this got started. Shav claimed the covid vaccines (most of them) are not called gene vaccines. They are. I was clearly right all along. You moved the goal post. I didn't say they were called gene therapy, I said they were called gene vaccines.

1 edit

@shavixmir said
For fukk’s sake.

Your mistake in reasoning has been pointed out to you so often, I just want to kick your teeth out your face.

Have you emailed them yet?
Even ATY said they are called gene vaccines.

He disagrees with you.


@metal-brain said
So you admit they are called gene vaccines.

That is how all of this got started. Shav claimed the covid vaccines (most of them) are not called gene vaccines. They are. I was clearly right all along. You moved the goal post. I didn't say they were called gene therapy, I said they were called gene vaccines.
They are not.
This has been pointed out to you a million times.

Stop spreading lies.


@metal-brain said
Even ATY said they are called gene vaccines.

He disagrees with you.
🚨🚧Moronity of MB alert!🚧🚨


@shavixmir said
They are not.
This has been pointed out to you a million times.

Stop spreading lies.
Even ATY said they are called gene vaccines.

He disagrees with you.


@shavixmir said
The covid vaccination is not a gene vaccine.

Now stick to the topic. Or have you come to realise you’re wrong and are backing away from the psychotic claim… just like your hero Malone has done?
Yes it is.

"Vaccination with AAVCOVID delivers genetic sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein—the characteristic protuberances on the coronavirus that it uses to enter host cells—so the body can develop an immune response to the virus."

https://hms.harvard.edu/news/gene-vaccine


@metal-brain said
Even ATY said they are called gene vaccines.

He disagrees with you.
So fukking what?

I don’t know who that is, and I don’t give a damn either.
In anyways, if he disagrees with me on this matter he’s not a virologist, nor an expert on the subject in any way.


Shav is a closet conspiracy theorist. He thinks there is a big conspiracy by wikipedia, Harvard Medical School and government to give him misinformation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_vaccine

From the government link below:

"For rapid development, RNA vaccines and adenovirus vector vaccines have been urgently approved, and their injection has already started across the world. These types of vaccine technologies have been developed over more than 20 years using translational research for use against cancer or diseases caused by genetic disorders but the COVID-19 vaccines are the first licensed drugs to prevent infectious diseases using RNA vaccine technology."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33772572/

Adenovirus vector vaccines do not alter DNA as ATY correctly said earlier in this thread. They are still called "gene vaccines" by Harvard Medical School and a government website says they utilize gene therapy technology.

It is time for shav to accept reality for a change.


@metal-brain said
Both yes and no.
My understanding is these vaccines use our genetic machinery to produce a protein, which would be a no to them changing of our DNA. You say yes and no. Please explain?


@metal-brain said
Shav is a closet conspiracy theorist. He thinks there is a big conspiracy by wikipedia, Harvard Medical School and government to give him misinformation.
No, he - and any other sane person - thinks you're a moron who misinterprets what... whoever is your expert now, seriously, you're citing Pikiwedia as a source? Even they themselves don't accept internal citogenesis... to the extent that you are constructing a conspiracy theory by every effing one else to deny you your day of glory in being accepted as a genius by Harvard.

Face it. Harvard disagrees with you, not with Shav. You're just too schizophrenic to realise it.


@Metal-Brain
Well, we should all fall over and play dead then THOUSAND LIKES IT.