Go back
9-11  terrorist gets life in prison

9-11 terrorist gets life in prison

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
But where is it all going?

Public spending per student > Primary level
#36 United States 17.9
Public spending per student > Secondary level
#51 United States 22.4
#52 New Zealand 22.3
Public spending per student > Tertiary level
#98 United States 23.9

(and if we didn't have to spend so much defending world peace, there'd be more to spend on the students.)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
Mhmmmm...yes, interesting site.
Using those figures:
...
We also note that the % of total government spending on education in the US is 17.1%, far behind Cuba, Kenya and Vanauta (which I didn't even know was a country).
...
Go and paint your bloody toe nails!
(we'd have more to spend on education if we didn't have to spend so much defending the world ...)

(you should try lavender, it might get a more positive response at the gym.)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
I'll be here another 2 days and then you can find me in Leopold's in Bombay.
LOL.

Trying to get into the fake passport trade, Shav?

D

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dixon Bainbridge
Not my Country you retard.
[/b]Well,
with a name like yours, who's to know?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by slappy115
clairton pa usa come up and see me some time
I'd be pissed off too if I lived that close to Pittsburg.

/Philly reppin'

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Luck
DEMOCRATS = ARE AGAINST PUNISHMENT PERIOD.
THEY ARE ALWAYS LOOKING FOR SOME EXCUSE TO BLAME OTHERS.

Harri / Luck
Democrats and Republicans,Conservatives and Liberals both suck. i dont allow myself to get caught up in their Bullshit and Lies.The 2 party system here in the usa sucks and right now we have a man who is not quantified to be PRESIDENT and his policies have got our country in a mess today we should have never invaded iraq they had nothing to do with 9-11 and there were never no wmd once this was found the story changed now we were told we are in iraq to liberate the iraqi people but in the meantime Bin-Laden is still on the loose--- here is a country that put a man on the moon but cant catch a third world terriost face it people they dont want to capture him. i supported Bush right after 9-11 i felt going into Afghanistan was the right thing to do but when Bush invaded iraq he lost my support and to my way of thinking its been one lie after the next from the Bush people. hell at one time we supported SADDAM AND BIN-LADEN i was in the us military in the late 70s and early 80s. We supplied Saddam with wmd in 1980 under the Reagan administration Saddam used wmd on the kurds and the Reagan white house looked the otherway and said nothing why because at the time we hated iran because they were holding americans hostage at the american embassy and iraq was in a boarder war with iran so Saddam was our allie same for Bin laden in 1980 the russians invaded afghaninstan and Bin -laden along with the afghaninstan army fought off the russians in a 10 year war we supplied Bin laden with weapons dont forget this was the height of the cold war SO ALL THIS CRAP COMING OUT OF THE BUSH WHITEHOUSE IS SPIN AND BULLSHIT THEY USE FEAR TO KEEP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SCARED AND THEREFORE BEHIND THEM WAKE UP FOLKS HIGH FUEL AT THE PUMP, NO GOOD JOBS ETC LAYOFFS SCHOOL FUNDS CUT SOCIAL SECURITY A WAR WITH NO END IN SITE THIS PRESIDENT IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN MY LIFETIME AND THATS SAYING SOMETHING WOW BUSH SUCKS

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dixon Bainbridge
Dixon is not my real name retard, i only use it for top secret SAS missions.
Ahhhh...

Like the training of Pol Pot's men in the 70's.
And the shooting of civilians in Ireland and Gibralter.

Great guy you must be.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Just been reading RichFeet's post. I can understand his frustrations.

Bush invaded Iraq to land a second term, having promised the American people a 'war' on terror! Iraq was supposedly just an easy target that would be a quick win with few casualties - which it was pre-election. Now he has his own private Vietnam and few allies who (don't) want to be there. That said those that are there have no idea of an exit strategy, without leaving anarchy and genocide in their wake.

The problem with Bush and Blair is they like the idea of being the 'world’s police', provided they don't actually have to do anything.

It's believed that Bin Laden is in the mountains of Pakistan, but not only do we only have a few (in relative terms) soldiers over to find the worlds most wanted man, we are actually reducing the numbers. A move that takes some explaining.

I'll give you another thing to ponder about these two inept leaders. If the US and the UK are to be the 'world's police', why do we do nothing about Countries like North Korea, China, Zimbabwe, to name but 3, who's human rights abuses and subjugation of their own people are so appalling, but other than a few words, largely left unpunished.

Korea, has the bomb and a leader mad enough to use it at anywhere within range of its missiles. China again has the bomb and more ground troops than almost everyone else put together - so we won't antagonize them. Zimbabwe, well a field trip from a 7th grade class could over come most of Zimbabwe, so why we will not tackle a man who slaughters his own people is unfathomable!

How is it that we, as a voting public, put up with these men who cannot hold to promises or act as Statesmen of worthy and honour? RichFeet is right, the two party system in America reduces the voting system to who can win the polls in court as money and the influence of the 'special interest lobby groups' can buy you even the White House.

For the UK, it possibly even worse. Whist we have 3 parties by name, in real terms it is a one party system as the other two are not worth voting for. That said Labour is rapidly descending to levels of sleaze tat still afflicted the last Conservatives government.

The liberals are nothing more than bunch of people who want to tax anything that moves or consumes fuel. The Conservatives are still a group of anarchic elitists who are so busy with fighting themselves that they cannot possibly form a cohesive opposition to a Labour party that is rapidly imploding.

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

I've come into this a bit late.

There's a lot of understandable anger aimed at this guy and people seem to want to do all sorts of nasty things to him. I wold agree that he does seem a particularly unpleasant character.

However, one thing bothers me. A quote from a journalist who was sitting through the trail went something like this "It seems that there was no evidence that he had much to do with the 9/11 bombings at all". This would appear to be the reason he didn't get the death penalty.

If this is the case, how come he was given life imprisonment with no possibility of release which is an extremely severe punishment.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dixon Bainbridge
All Politic people are fu'king bastards that rape and pillige the little man imo. John Presscot got shot by an egg by an angry Cockney homosexual and he punced him in the face. We as England commoners pay there wages so we should be allowed to throw an egg at them. ffs in Wales you can kill someone on a Tuesday by Law. How mad is that. England is the best ever Country invented imo.

Haway the toon.
How does an egg carry a gun?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dixon Bainbridge
All Politic people are fu'king bastards that rape and pillige the little man imo. John Presscot got shot by an egg by an angry Cockney homosexual and he punched him in the face. We as England commoners pay there wages so we should be allowed to throw an egg at them. ffs in Wales you can kill someone on a Tuesday by Law. How mad is that. England is the best ever Country invented imo.

Haway the toon.
By buying things at Sainsbury's you pay the wages of the shop assistants. Are you going to start throwing eggs at them as well?