Originally posted by Very RustyAnd I've asked her for some examples of posts she alerted that didn't get deleted.
That is only if the Mod on at the time agrees the post should be deleted. I've alerted posts that were not removed by a mod. Then alerted a few days later and it was removed. (Same post, go figure)!!! Different Mods like us have different opinions on what should be deleted.
Originally posted by SuzianneSuzianne: Well, with my disappointment with watching a once great site descend into mediocrity because of the bullying of a few and the inaction of those who could actually do something about it, I'd be surprised if I even finished what will probably be my last sub year here. No regrets.
One more time only: who said I was speaking of alerted posts?
What posts were you referring to? What was the "inaction" - in your view - regarding those posts?
Originally posted by FMFSir,
She has entered her opinion on the "inaction" regarding certain posts into the public discussion. What posts? What inaction?
Again, she can not discuss that in public. She can't be specific about what posts, it is between her and the Moderator. What part of that do you find hard to understand? I've talked to Mods in private about certain posts, and they have given me an explanation on why. Not that I always agreed with it, but at least they gave me an answer.
Kind Regards,
Sincerely,
-VR
Originally posted by Very RustyWhat's hard to understand is how she might think there's any integrity in seeking - very much in public - to condemn the Moderators' supposed "inaction" while keeping her evidence for it secret. Maybe Suzianne was wrong - and is wrong now - and the Moderators are being unfairly maligned. Unfortunately, any substantiation Suzianne may have to offer for her condemnation seems to be secret as she now instead quibbles the word "deleted".
Again, she can not discuss that in public. She can't be specific about what posts, it is between her and the Moderator. What part of that do you find hard to understand?
Originally posted by FMFFOR THE LAST TIME:
What's hard to understand is how she might think there's any integrity in seeking - very much in public - to condemn the Moderators' supposed "inaction" while keeping her evidence for it secret. Maybe Suzianne was wrong - and is wrong now - and the Moderators are being unfairly maligned. Unfortunately, any substantiation Suzianne may have to offer for her condemnation seems to be secret as she now instead quibbles the word "deleted".
Sir,
Again, she can not discuss that in public. She can't be specific about what posts, it is between her and the Moderator. What part of that do you find hard to understand? I've talked to Mods in private about certain posts, and they have given me an explanation on why. Not that I always agreed with it, but at least they gave me an answer. Now you are fortunate if you hear anything back. There was a time you knew exactly what Moderator you were talking to. Now it just says MODERATOR!!! They have become nameless.
Kind Regards,
Sincerely,
-VR
Originally posted by Very RustyBut she's not keeping anything "between her and the Moderator". She is making unsubstantiated accusations in public - about both Moderators and posters - and threatening to either leave the site or at least punish Russ by withholding her money from him.
Again, she can not discuss that in public. She can't be specific about what posts, it is between her and the Moderator.