Bring it!

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Not really. You were asked a direct question which you deliberately and knowingly gave an untruthful answer to. That's a lie.

Actually my answer was true... I went back to look after he referred me to those threads, but those threads were not there. And they weren't there the first time I went back to see if they were there or not. So what? FMF routinely answers questions with statements that aren't really answers... so why haven't I seen you calling him out on that? Are you new here?

I think what FMF was trying to establish is whether or not I had seen for myself what had been said in those threads. Deception is a form of lying, is it not? If he was able to establish that I had not seen those threads then it would simply be a matter of him trying to convince me of what was said there. I led him into believing I did not have first hand knowledge of what was in those two threads, but he didn't ask me if I had or not... he asked no direct question of me to that effect.

He could have asked Did you or did you not see what was written in those two threads?... this is the information he appeared to be fishing for. I won't ask him if this is true or not because quite frankly I think he thrives on deception... so asking him about this would be fruitless.



By the way, I already know you are not new here... but you're kind of a one trick pony, aren't you?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Or you could tell us why you posted what you did.

Are you Limeboy's New Best Friend? I feel sorry for both of you.

Originally posted by lemon lime
Actually my answer was true... I went back to look after he referred me to those threads, but those threads were not there. And they weren't there the first time I went back to see if they were there or not. So what? FMF routinely answers questions with statement that aren't really answers... so why haven't I seen [b]you calling him out on that ...[text shortened]... the way, I already know you are not new here... but you're kind of a one trick pony, aren't you?[/b]

That's an awful lot of waffle for a straight forward question don't ya think? So you're now lying about your lying?

Originally posted by lemon lime
By the way, I already know you are not new here... but you're kind of a one trick pony, aren't you?

As opposed to a nine-trick pony like yourself.

Originally posted by HandyAndy
Are you Limeboy's New Best Friend? I feel sorry for both of you.

Sympathy at last, see that Noobster, Andy has some sympathy for me which is more than you gave me this morning! A £9 library fine and NO sympathy! Man what a fast friend!

Originally posted by Proper Knob
That's an awful lot of waffle for a straight forward question don't ya think? So you're now lying about your lying?

like I said, a one trick pony...

Originally posted by lemon lime
like I said, a one trick pony...

Call it what you want. You're the one caught lying.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Sympathy at last, see that Noobster, Andy has some sympathy for me which is more than you gave me this morning! A £9 library fine and NO sympathy! Man what a fast friend!

Sympathy at last...

Yes, but why the sudden outburst of empathy? And why does it never last for more than a mere millisecond?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Call it what you want. You're the one caught lying.

LOL You really are a knob, aren't you?

Originally posted by lemon lime
LOL You really are a knob, aren't you?

You better believe it.

Originally posted by lemon lime
[b]Sympathy at last...

Yes, but why the sudden outburst of empathy? And why does it never last for more than a mere millisecond?[/b]

Andy still hasn't fessed up as to why he posted what he did, do you think he's taken the fifth lest he incriminate himself?

Originally posted by lemon lime
Aha, here it is... this is why you assumed I had never read those two threads.

[b]You: Did you read those two threads I mentioned before they were deleted?

Me: Nope. I looked but they were already gone. Can you find someone who might be able to back up your allegation?

I looked for the threads after you mentioned them. An ...[text shortened]... testimony to your flawless and tactically sound style of debate... Congratulations are in order.[/b]

lol ... what a bunch of stierenstront!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Andy still hasn't fessed up as to why he posted what he did, do you think he's taken the fifth lest he incriminate himself?

Tell me which post concerns you and I'll tell you why I posted it.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Andy still hasn't fessed up as to why he posted what he did, do you think he's taken the fifth lest he incriminate himself?

The poem [and others] had been posted here at RHP several times and also elsewhere on the net under a different name.

Originally posted by lemon lime

I think what FMF was trying to establish is whether or not I had seen for myself what had been said in those threads. Deception is a form of lying, is it not? If he was able to establish that I had not seen those threads then it would simply be a matter of him trying to convince me of what was said there. I led him into believing I did not have first hand knowledge of what was in those two threads, but he didn't ask me if I had or not... he asked no direct question of me to that effect.

But I did ask a direct question: "Did you read those two threads I mentioned before they were deleted?"

To which you answered: "Nope. I looked but they were already gone."

Are you now claiming that you did read them before they were deleted?