2 edits
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIs that a "yes" you are happy for the veracity of your claim that you have not been judgmental with regard to divegeester on this thread to be an indicator of your integrity?
Yes ... [etc.].
Was that what the word "yes" was confirming?
Originally posted by FMFand yet I suggest to you that the forum would be more interested in hearing an explanation of your own behaviour, which you have dodged and failed to produce.
robbie is asked to stake his integrity on the things he's said and the way he's behaved on this thread and he dodges, deflects, and then... disappears. 😛
Originally posted by robbie carrobiePeople's "forum behaviour" is something that is in the eye of each and every beholder. I am happy with how I have acquitted myself as evidenced by my posting history; I stand by everything I've ever said - and I'm willing to apologize or clarify if otherwise. What you happen to make of my "forum behaviour" is a matter for you.
and yet I suggest to you that the forum would be more interested in hearing an explanation of your own behaviour, which you have dodged and failed to produce.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAre happy for the veracity - and sincerity - of your claim, that you have not been judgmental on this thread, to be an indicator by which people can evaluate your integrity as a poster?
Yes but I am still at a loss to explain your behaviour though. Why do you dredge elements up from the past in order to confront and humiliate other people.
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFIf I was you I would be more concerned about my own inability to explain my own forum behaviour.
Are happy for the veracity - and sincerity - of your claim, that you have not been judgmental on this thread, to be an indicator by which people can evaluate your integrity as a poster?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieLike I said, people's "forum behaviour" is something that is in the eye of each and every beholder. I post what I post. It's not for me to explain. It's for you to make what you want of it.
If I was you I would be more concerned about your inability to explain your own forum behaviour.
Originally posted by FMFIts not for you to explain? you mean its inexplicable? you don't know why you dredge elements up from the past in order to confront other users?
Like I said, people's "forum behaviour" is something that is in the eye of each and every beholder. I post what I post. It's not for me to explain. It's for you to make what you want of it.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhen I raise things that people have said in the past - just as you do, all the time - I do it because those things seem to me to be pertinent. Added to which is that the fact that I stand by everything I've ever said, and I expect nothing less from other posters.
Its not for you to explain? you mean its inexplicable? you don't know why you dredge elements up from the past in order to confront other users?
2 edits
Originally posted by FMFHow very interesting, at last, a confession! you want to hold people to the same standards as yourself! and that my friend is the very definition of self righteousness in black and white. Perhaps you have never thought of yourself as self righteous?
When I raise things that people have said in the past - just as you do, all the time - I do it because those things seem to me to be pertinent. Added to which is that the fact that I stand by everything I've ever said, and I expect nothing less from other posters.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI am honest. Consistent. Forthright. And engaged. I hope that everyone more or less aspires to the same things. Yes, sure.
How very interesting, at last, a confession! you want to hold people to the same standards as yourself! and that my friend is the very definition of self righteousness in black and white. Perhaps you have never thought of yourself as self righteous?