Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Footnote Two: Here's a summary of the activity volumes of your own threads on this forum which have received
one hundred (100) or more posts August 26 [page 16] to December 18, 2015 (during the past 114 days):
FMF = [b]0 threads
Kegge = 0 threads
Trev33 = 0 threads
orangutan = 0 threads
Comment: With thi ...[text shortened]... ply to drewnogal in a few days, I'll respond to your criticisms of my threads on this forum. ~GB[/b]
So other people don't create threads that get loads of posts.
In my case, probably because I don't post that much - so any threads I do create don't go down the self fuelling route (compare my 75ish posts in the last 90 days to your 1300+).
You post a
lot in the threads you start - frequently reposting your first post and often replying to questions with a copy of an earlier post.
You also have a knack for starting the controversial type of thread that gets a fair bit of flack.
Quantity. Well done.
Quality ... that's subjective.
Like I say, no one can deny that you energise the forums here - it's my personal opinion that your brand of energy (copy paste, copy paste, list, list - avoid questions) isn't particularly interesting.
Start a blog Grampy Bobby. Your fans will still get the bobby hit and your detractors won't have to worry.
Doesn't everyone win that way?