Go back
Memo

Memo

General

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
dude the only people looking like fools at this moment in time are you and your boyfriend for lack of evidence, you have been caught by your own propaganda, its joyous. People can now see you for what you are nothing more than a pair of lying and insidious creeps that make up lies about people simply to cause them pain.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

3 edits

-Removed-
I have not in principle nor in any shape or form and I quote, 'defended the cover up of people having sex with children - FMF ' and you cannot produce a single reference where I have despite being asked five or six possibly more times, because it does not exist and your sinister and creepy boyfriend has been caught making assertions that he cannot substantiate.

If you like i will produce the statement where I state that those who have engaged in criminality should face justice, shall i do it now? shall I?


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Fine let the site administration decide whether or not i have as you have claimed, (without being able to reproduce a single piece of substantiating evidence), that I have and I quote, ' defended the cover up of people having sex with children'
The kind of cover ups you defended are carried out by the organisation you are a member of ~ and the perpetrators whose sex crimes you argued in favour of covering up are members of that organization. It's all in that thread I linked to.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
The kind of cover ups you defended are carried out by the organisation you are a member of ~ and the perpetrators whose sex crimes you argued in favour of covering up are members of that organization. It's all in that thread I linked to.
sure it is and yet you seem unable to provide a single reference, why is that? Do you expect people to believe you simply because you say it is?


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
If you like i will produce the statement where I state that those who have engaged in criminality should face justice, shall i do it now? shall I?
If you have changed your stance since the thread in question and your current stance is that you do not support or endorse the covering up or withholding of information from law enforcement authorities of sexual abuse of children (committed by members of your organization) by your organisation in any circumstances then why not just say so now.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sure it is and yet you seem unable to provide a single reference, why is that?
Read the thread. There are pages and pages of you laying out your argument for keeping cases of child sex abuse confidential within your organization and not telling the authorities.


Originally posted by FMF
If you have changed your stance since the thread in question and your current stance is that you do not support or endorse the covering up or withholding of information from law enforcement authorities of sexual abuse of children (committed by members of your organization) by your organisation in any circumstances then why not just say so now.
dude i don't believe your propaganda, why don't you understand, its meaningless drivel, we are not interested in what you think, we are interested in evidence and so far you have been able to produce nothing, why is that?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
dude i don't believe your propaganda, why don't you understand, its meaningless drivel, we are not interested in what you think, we are interested in evidence and so far you have been able to produce nothing, why is that?
Thread 162947. It's all there. have you been back to read it?

4 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Read the thread. There are pages and pages of you laying out your argument for keeping cases of child sex abuse confidential within your organization and not telling the authorities.
Again that is not evidence, you have made a serious claim and repeating ad nauseum that it in the thread is not working for you dude, its just not very convincing. Do you think other people will be convinced by it? what kind of fools do you take them for?

Here is your statement again in case you have forgotten it, you have stated that i have and i quote, 'defended the cover up of people having sex with children' these are your words are they not, i simply want to know where i have in your words, ''defended the cover up of people having sex with children'. surely you know and can provide a reference?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Thread 162947. It's all there. have you been back to read it?
yes and i can find not a single reference where i have and i quote your words, 'defended the cover up of people having sex with children' and seeing that you cannot provide any i am forced top conclude that either you made it up and are a vile liar or that it does not exists. You see sir the onus is on you to provide evidence for your claims, not me.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes and i can find not a single reference where i have and i quote your words, 'defended the cover up of people having sex with children' and seeing that you cannot provide any i am forced top conclude that either you made it up and are a vile liar or that it does not exists. You see sir the onus is on you to provide evidence for your claims, not me.
In any case, this whole nonsense reads like a few people demonising Robbie and holding him responsible for the wrongdoing of other individuals over whom he has no control.

It's embarrassing in its self-righteous stupidity.

Vote Up
Vote Down


Memo

To my friends, for personal reasons I've decided not to renew my subscription which expires on January 6, 2016. To my almost friends, this will be my final thread on this forum for the foreseeable future. To Russ and his Admin Staff, thank you for an enjoyable experience since July, 2007. Kind Regards, GB

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.