Go back
Not getting any

Not getting any

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by arrakis
Step away for a moment... Look at what's going on here.

This is the part where the MALES fight each other for the female's attention. In past practice the male who wins, mates with the female... 😕

I find it amazing that even though we are now an advanced species in the field of communications, that the original primate directives are carried on.

...[text shortened]... al of the species). Somehow, when you look at it in this manner, I'm not so horny anymore. 🙁
So this is why boxing turns me on?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TheSkipper
I find it interesting that so many people in this thread do not seem to understand the concept of asexuality. I must admit that when I first read that you are a 35 year old virgin I instantly assumed religious fundamentalist.

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Lewis Carroll asexual?

Upon learning about asexuality (and only a little bit of learn ...[text shortened]... , do underestand (to the extent a young man who loves sex can anyway.)

Peace,


TheSkipper
Thanks! 🙂 I don't know if Lewis Carroll was asexual. I don't really know much about asexuality in general. I got that link I posted earlier on an autism mailing list and have read a bit there, but it hasn't been a very important issue for me, although it's nice to know that there are other asexual people out there.

Edit: Oh, and I am very far from being a religious fundamentalist, as anybody who has read my posts in the Spirituality Forum knows. 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mokko
So this is why boxing turns me on?
A Cardboard fetish eh ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Jay Peatea
A Cardboard fetish eh ?
Mabye it's just the duct tape 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by arrakis
Heh, I offered to cuddle you. I did not want to have sex with you. Oh well, I liked your pictures on your website, sweetie.
You probably missed my post about tactile hypersensitivity. No cuddling, thanks. 😞 And you better don't call me "sweetie" again either. 🙄

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mokko
So this is why boxing turns me on?
What about sumo wrestling?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mokko
Mabye it's just the duct tape 😉
Oh no not another duct tape psyco nut ! delmer must have corrupted you.

Sellotape ra ra ra, Sellotape ra ra ra, Sellotape ra ra ra

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
Thanks! 🙂 I don't know if Lewis Carroll was asexual. I don't really know much about asexuality in general. I got that link I posted earlier on an autism mailing list and have read a bit there, but it hasn't been a very important issue for me, although it's nice to know that there are other asexual people out there.

Edit: Oh, and I am very far ...[text shortened]... a religious fundamentalist, as anybody who has read my posts in the Spirituality Forum knows. 🙂
Check out the author of Cerebus the Aardvark Comic series. David Sim... brilliant, in my opinion anyway, but interesting attitude towards sex. You might find it an interesting read. On the other hand, it might lead you to think me more disturbed than I've already demonstrated myself to be.

Either way, much respect and admiration,

HH

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
It's probably a severe case of Neurotypical Syndrome. Quote from http://isnt.autistics.org/ :

"Neurotypical syndrome is a neurobiological disorder characterized by preoccupation with social concerns, delusions of superiority, and obsession with conformity.

Neurotypical individuals often assume that their experience of the world is either the only one, or the only correct one."

😉
Had to give you a wreck on this one Nordlys. I'm surprised how much patience you have shown trying to get people to understand something they're unfamiliar with.

Perhaps everyone should read a little slower.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
Check out the author of Cerebus the Aardvark Comic series. David Sim... brilliant, in my opinion anyway, but interesting attitude towards sex. You might find it an interesting read. On the other hand, it might lead you to think me more disturbed than I've already demonstrated myself to be.

Either way, much respect and admiration,

HH
Thanks, I'll check it out.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I was at work trying to figure out if there were any ladies in my phonebook that might not be repulsed by the notion of going on an overnight Friday when I came to a small realization about myself; I have a very different view of relationships in general and cheating in particular. It at least seemed this way to me when I was looking at the names.

There were six girls I was considering and I worked down to two. I have been involved with all but one of them in the past to some degree or another, and in all of the situations I was "cheating" on them. By cheating here I mean in a sexual way, but I never considered it wrong because I was always there when I was supposed to be. Our relationship didn't suffer simply because there were other girls. There was never an acknowledgement of being exclusive, but sometimes it was implied. If it was implied, I never actively looked, but never turned down a shot nonetheless.

My point for discussion is this: In a relationship where exclusiveness is implied, is it worse to cheat sexually, or to cheat by being unavalible when you should be ie. breaking dates without explanation, not answering calls (calling is never done to an unreasonable degree), or otherwise. Maybe my relationships are just f-ed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by GeraldM
I was at work trying to figure out if there were any ladies in my phonebook that might not be repulsed by the notion of going on an overnight Friday when I came to a small realization about myself; I have a very different view of relationships in general and cheating in particular. It at least seemed this way to me when I was looking at the names.

The ...[text shortened]... g is never done to an unreasonable degree), or otherwise. Maybe my relationships are just f-ed.
You should have your weenie removed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mokko
You should have your weenie removed.
Nice one.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by GeraldM
My point for discussion is this: In a relationship where exclusiveness is implied, is it worse to cheat sexually, or to cheat by being unavalible when you should be ie. breaking dates without explanation, not answering calls (calling is never done to an unreasonable degree), or otherwise. Maybe my relationships are just f-ed.
is there a better or worse? Both hurt, and nobody should have to deal with either, including your so-called girls where you pull the "We never SAID we couldn't see other people" gig.

That being said, I will answer your question. I'd rather the person love me and fulfill any sexual needs I can't with someone else than have the person be rude, secretive, suspicious, and downright insensitive.

Vote Up
Vote Down

That being said, I will answer your question. I'd rather the person love me and fulfill any sexual needs I can't with someone else than have the person be rude, secretive, suspicious, and downright insensitive.[/b]
I never included those qualities in my description of things. I also never mentioned love. We seem to be speaking in very different terms.