Originally posted by Very RustyIt's not ALL I talk about, just a small part of the arsenal, nay, the brilliant repertoire I have at my disposal. If you are as good looking and rich as you attest to being, well, I won't tell if you won't.
That is all you talk about is Homosexuality, showing other men your private parts, OH and lets not forget your reach arounds that you can only have the courage to do on a chess site forum. 😛 😉 😉
Again does you wife know about your bi side?
1 edit
Originally posted by ChessPraxisThe OP asks: "Despite a couple of polite requests not to PM me, Grampy Bobby does so anyway. Anyone else on this forum had this problem in the past?"
Yes sir, but the matter is private. Airing out such a grievence in a public arena is akin to attention whoring. What difference does it make if others here had a similar experience in private.
What difference does it make if I ask others here if they had a similar experience in private?
Originally posted by Hand of HecateJust because I'm richer than you and better looking that you are, doesn't really make me don Jaun or what ever the hell his name is! 😛
It's not ALL I talk about, just a small part of the arsenal, nay, the brilliant repertoire I have at my disposal. If you are as good looking and rich as you attest to being, well, I won't tell if you won't.
You got nothing but bi-sexual talk from what I've seen!
I have nothing against bi-sexual male or female, but you do go on, and on about it, you must admit. 😛
Originally posted by ChessPraxisThere was nothing wrong with the content of Grampy Bobby's PMs so there's no "attempt to publicly shame" him. They were not insulting or abusive at all. I sought to canvass the views of others, and several of them seem to have had a similar experience. If it's pretty much common knowledge that Grampy Bobby sends PMs to people who don't want them [or they have to block them in order to stop him], then me inquiring about this "common knowledge" can hardly be described as an "attempt to publicly shame" him.
This is an attempt to publicly shame Bob. If that's the case I think you'll need to bring out the heavy artillery.
Just sayin
Originally posted by FMFBS-O-Meter
There was nothing wrong with the content of Grampy Bobby's PMs so there's no "attempt to publicly shame" him. They were not insulting or abusive at all. I sought to canvass the views of others, and several of them seem to have had a similar experience. If it's pretty much common knowledge that Grampy Bobby sends PMs to people who don't want them [or they have to ...[text shortened]... this "common knowledge" can hardly be described as an "attempt to publicly shame" him.
...............l.
Originally posted by FMFI think you're just looking for something to gripe about in public, with someone who you figure most have a problem with.
I don't think I should have to use the ignore function if I have already asked him politely not to PM me.
When all it takes is to use the ignore function, you seem to be just looking to instigate, IMHO.