Go back
radiohead - in rainbows

radiohead - in rainbows

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
Sod off, whether you like them or not they're nowhere near Phil Collins' despicable excuse for music.
You're right. Phil is on an entirely different level.
That gorilla suit rocks man!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
radiohead is the genesis of the 90's. soothing, whiny and pretentious. I bet most ardent phil collins fans have ok computer in their cd rack.
Early Genesis was quite good, actually. Before Phil Collins turned it into a bus crash.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
radiohead is the genesis of the 90's. soothing, whiny and pretentious. I bet most ardent phil collins fans have ok computer in their cd rack.
I wish I could meet an ardent Phil Collins fan. But Radiohead is a different case. A better comparison would be Oasis--eh?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
But Radiohead is a different case. A better comparison would be Oasis--eh?
lulz1

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trevor33
no, i'm differently not saying that. i'm saying you should just accept that its a great album because sooooooo many people think so.

i can't stand elvis but recognize he was great because of how many fans he had.

i would however say that the bends was their 'platform' to success not ok computer.

actually, creep was more of a platform than ok computer.
Okay fair play. Subjectivity and all that. There are a few tracks by Radiohead that I think are quite brilliant. High and Dry, Creep, Street Spirit, Karma Police and No surprises.
Ther's a hell of a lot of stuff by them I can't stand. But that's my opinion and your's is your's.
What grips my poo though, is when people say that everything that a band does is brilliant just because it is by that particular band. It's almost like crappy branding.
'Yeah I'm great because I like this band that everyone else does'. If you know what I mean.
Rather than 'I like tis music on its merits. It has this that and the other attributes that please me.'
You wimmy Jimmy?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trevor33
i'm saying you should just accept that its a great album because sooooooo many people think so.
The trevor-logical conclusion:

Britney Spears >>>> Radiohead.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
I wish I could meet an ardent Phil Collins fan. But Radiohead is a different case. A better comparison would be Oasis--eh?
at least radiohead sounds like radiohead. every single oasis song sounds like someone else. blatant ripoffs ranging from beatles to black sabbath.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
at least radiohead sounds like radiohead. every single oasis song sounds like someone else. blatant ripoffs ranging from beatles to black sabbath.
Rip off or just influence.
Degree varying from light to heavy.
Init?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
at least radiohead sounds like radiohead. every single oasis song sounds like someone else. blatant ripoffs ranging from beatles to black sabbath.
You've got it wrong--all those bands were so many John the Baptists to the Oasis Jesus (who, let me note in passing, has been unfairly accused of similar crimes against originality).

To top it off, Oasis is, or was, a refreshing fruit drink.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
You've got it wrong--all those bands were so many John the Baptists to the Oasis Jesus (who, let me note in passing, has been unfairly accused of similar crimes against originality).

To top it off, Oasis is, or was, a refreshing fruit drink.
Or a water hole in the desert...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jimslyp69
Or a water hole in the desert...
Much as the nineties were a desert, Oasis' champagne salvation turned out to be a mirage. I was amazed, though, at how partisan people were about their music. Good play to the shaggy brothers. What are they up to now?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Much as the nineties were a desert, Oasis' champagne salvation turned out to be a mirage. I was amazed, though, at how partisan people were about their music. Good play to the shaggy brothers. What are they up to now?
I'm not singing their praises but they were good for a while. The whole guitar thing was. 1990ish then 1995ish. Mad chester they called it. Just a breath of fresh air. Wasn't just Manchester bands responsiblw however. We had plenty of bands from everywhere having a dig! Rather than effing good looking people who sound good in a studio after ninety seven takes.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
You've got it wrong--all those bands were so many John the Baptists to the Oasis Jesus (who, let me note in passing, has been unfairly accused of similar crimes against originality).

To top it off, Oasis is, or was, a refreshing fruit drink.
black sabbath - a hard road


oasis - lyla

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jimslyp69
Rather than effing good looking people who sound good in a studio after ninety seven tokes.
I enjoyed most of those bands - Stone Roses, Verve and so on; thought Oasis was the weakest in terms of ideas. But they could crank it up. Suede, now, on the other hand...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
black sabbath - a hard road
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-32fJLfSaLA

oasis - lyla
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khBMcCQeT2k
Imagine if Black Sabbath had opted for mop-tops instead of locks.