Originally posted by FMF The twenty or so regulars here who read that PM you sent me (I passed the contents on to them) might find the gap between what you are saying here, now, and what you said in that PM, rather curious. 😉
Congratulations on the single biggest 'dick move' ever on this site (and yes, there are others that didn't quite rise to this level), but I had already sussed out that you are a disgusting human being.
I understand that your "raison d'etre" is to put me down (merely for speaking out against abuse? Say it isn't so, Mr. Trump! ), but the fact remains that the only similarities between the two (which cover far different topics) is me saying here "IF I let my sub go". How gracious of you to glom onto this to further attempt to "put me down". News item: Other people aren't nearly as fossilized by the things they say as you are. Things change. Get over it. Maybe you will one day grow up and no longer attack other posters merely for the high crime of disagreeing with you.
Originally posted by divegeester What do you mean you "get it"? He's taking about forum moderation and your talking about clan ranking regulation.
The topic here is "dissatisfaction of the site", not your own personal agenda.
Everyone has a different reason for their dissatisfaction, as you could tell by reading this thread, instead of blindly swinging at people who disagree with ingratiating, toe-sucking toadies like you.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie Woa clandestine PM's and subterfuge! Its not been a good year for Suzi the Snowflake.
Hey, moron.
ALL PMs *should* be "clandestine" even if the subterfuge of some is plainly visible. It's too bad that RHP doesn't care for the privacy of its members. They used to temporarily ban people for releasing PMs, as you well know.
Engine users have been kicked off this site. If the site owners had any self-respect, you'd be gone too, for what you've done. But the voice of money is far too loud on this site. And here I thought it was only in corrupt, Republican America where money is counted as "free speech".
Originally posted by FMF The twenty or so regulars here who read that PM you sent me (I passed the contents on to them) might find the gap between what you are saying here, now, and what you said in that PM, rather curious.
FMF passed around the contents of a private message? And then brags about it?
Originally posted by apathist FMF passed around the contents of a private message? And then brags about it?
It's not a "brag". It's simply a point of information. It was abusive and contained threats. There was therefore no obligation to keep it confidential. I don't subscribe to the idea that you have to keep the secrets of abusive people who want you to keep their abuse secret. You can read it if you want. Let me know.
Originally posted by Suzianne ALL PMs *should* be "clandestine" even if the subterfuge of some is plainly visible. It's too bad that RHP doesn't care for the privacy of its members. They used to temporarily ban people for releasing PMs, as you well know.
Originally posted by FMF It's not a "brag". It's simply a point of information. It was abusive and contained threats. There was therefore no obligation to keep it confidential. I don't subscribe to the idea that you have to keep the secrets of abusive people who want you to keep their abuse secret. You can read it if you want. Let me know.
aak! RHP game of thrones danger! I'm headed back to town, lurking in the shadows, seeking loot. It doesn't seem healthy here for me.
Originally posted by apathist aak! RHP game of thrones danger! I'm headed back to town, lurking in the shadows, seeking loot. It doesn't seem healthy here for me.
I don't see Suzianne as a character in Game of Thrones ~ more that she's permanently trapped in her own performance of Samuel Becket's "Not I".