Originally posted by rbmorrisdumb me😳 Got you now 😛
Earlier in the thread (page 4), he made references to "natural selection", a term introduced by Charles Darwin in "The Origin of Species".
Personally, I think it's ridiculous to claim that a person armed with a gun, killing an innocent animal is practicing "natural selection".
My post was intended as sarcasm. 😛
By the way I watched documentary on TV last night (BBC2), about people doing hunting business for tourists in South Africa. They grow and nurture animals, and release them to be killed shot. I just don't feel comfortable about that at all. Just mentioned as not completely irrelevant here.
1 edit
Originally posted by Woodgiegee.. what happened to play nice.... yeah you're really up to the task here. 🙄
It is all I have to work with.
(I don't write my own material, some Latin dude did)
May I enquire as to your gender?
😀
No just let it be known that i find self-righteous selfish sissyboys to be tiresome and boring, more trouble than they are worth.
Please describe this "contest" with "winners and losers" that we must win at all costs, with some law-abiding candyass that prolly lacks severely any critical thinking skills and commonsense.
Maybe you can sense that "morals" is in another hemisphere for these hard-core NIMBYist losers.
"What is bad for the hive is bad for the bee" - Marcus Aurelius
Originally posted by Aikouh huh. please describe this social problem, other than i'm not a dull minded ego-centric wimp/pc sissyboy. please explain what being verbal means, and what this has to do with being functionally literate, and having the ability to type. 😕
If you are over 25 and STILL act like this verbally, you really do have a social problem and still so much to learn what you should've learned years ago.
- Joined
- 28 Jun 01
- Moves
- 36847
Originally posted by eldragonflyNot certain, but I think he means that's there better ways of arguing your point than calling us meat eaters, and I quote,"retarded selfish sub-human psychopaths." Assuming you are younger would increase the probabilty that you must resort to namecalling to get your point across. Just a shot in the dark, from a retarded sub-human. 😉
uh huh. please describe this social problem, other than i'm not a dull minded ego-centric wimp/pc sissyboy. please explain what being verbal means, and what this has to do with being functionally literate, and having the ability to type. 😕
- Joined
- 23 Mar 04
- Moves
- 264400
1 edit
Originally posted by eldragonflySocial stupidity, I said. Not overall stupidity.
uh huh. please describe this social problem, other than i'm not a dull minded ego-centric wimp/pc sissyboy. please explain what being verbal means, and what this has to do with being functionally literate, and having the ability to type. 😕
Being verbally (writing, saying) able to get your message across, and to be understood by others. Not only by context, but by reasoning and addressing too. This is something you'll learn during the years, but I fear you will still need to learn this.
- Joined
- 23 Mar 04
- Moves
- 264400
Originally posted by vacostnerYou scored a point!
Not certain, but I think he means that's there better ways of arguing your point than calling us meat eaters, and I quote,"retarded selfish sub-human psychopaths." Assuming you are younger would increase the probabilty that you must resort to namecalling to get your point across. Just a shot in the dark, from a retarded sub-human. 😉
Originally posted by eldragonflyTo what end are you working towards, your own justification or changing the way we do things?
gee.. what happened to play nice.... yeah you're really up to the task here. 🙄
No just let it be known that i find self-righteous selfish sissyboys to be tiresome and boring, more trouble than they are worth.
Please describe this "contest" with "winners and losers" that we must win at all costs, with some law-abiding candyass that prolly lacks sev ...[text shortened]... you can sense that "morals" in in another hemisphere for these hard-core NIMBYist losers.
I am not looking to cause chaos myself, if people enjoy eating meat then it should be done properly.
Are you a bit slightly mental perhaps.
😉
I bet you are a great laugh out on the booze.
😀
Originally posted by darvlaydarvlay you must be kidding. That food chain argument doesn't fly, the only thing your foolish inhumane "friend" didn't do was type in every word in all-caps. 😉
Actually, Mr. Mikelom made a good argument (in my opinion) that was rather simple:
"Innocent animals, as you put it, kill others to satisfy their base desire also. It is fortunate we are at the top of the chain to choose..."
And don't forget what Kurt said:
"It's okay to eat fish because they haven't any feelings."