Ribs and beer

Originally posted by Nordlys
I'd say you'd still have much better chances to convince someone that way than by calling them "retarded selfish sub-human". The latter is a pretty sure way to make them blind and deaf to whatever you have to say.

The truth doesn't come in a colorful and neatly shaped package.

Originally posted by eldragonfly
You cannot quantify suffering or put a "pricetag' on life, or just find it convenient to ignore crimes against nature, no matter what forms it takes. Here, let's take a second look at your sadistic viewpoint.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atgof-9nqPk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykOaXPAOSd8
"Hunting purely for your sadistic enjoyment and ...[text shortened]... ocent bear cry from such a sensless cruel and wasteful kill is just gut wrenching."

What part of "preferable" do you not understand?

Originally posted by Woodgie
Pretty much like the cries of lab animals.

I worked with two girls who used to laugh when they did it, do you think they listened.

silly analogy.

Try again.

😛

Originally posted by rbmorris
What part of "preferable" do you not understand?

What a macaroon! Watch the hunting videos..

Originally posted by rbmorris
What part of "preferable" do you not understand?

What part of "you cannot quantify suffering" don't you understand? grow up my man, stop placating these selfish, confused and woefully ignorant meat eating oafs and sadistic hunters.

Originally posted by eldragonfly
What part of "you cannot quantify suffering" don't you understand? grow up my man, stop placating these selfish, confused and woefully ignorant meat eating oafs and sadistic hunters.

As you know, I agree with the cause.

However, silly arguments, random insults and grossly-flawed logic don't help to advance it.

Quite the contrary.

Originally posted by rbmorris
Keep talking like that, Darwin. You're really making a great case for your own removal from the gene pool.

I don't know why you're calling him Darwin there. Darwin never said anything like that (as long as I know). That's so unreasonable he gets blame for other people's misinterpretations or misquotes. That's just so wrong 😠

Originally posted by Mimor
Non-human animals kill because they have no other choice for survival. A lion can't opt to graze instead of kill.

Humans do have a choice and we have awareness. We can choose not to add to suffering in this world and we can refuse to support the filth, cruelty and wastefulness that goes along with the meat industry. We also have the capacity to anticip ...[text shortened]... ature in order to satisfy an unnecessary desire, is choosing to be less than he or she can be.

This is the most decent post I've read so far in this thread.

Originally posted by Woodgie
The strain of Neanderthal thought process is not yet ready to die.

"When a man wants to kill a dog, he finds a stick easily"

That's a rather speciesist remark, essentially worthless.

Originally posted by rbmorris
As you know, I agree with the cause.

However, silly arguments, random insults and grossly-flawed logic don't help to advance it.

Quite the contrary.

this is insane.... your biases are very severe, the only misconstructions, flawed logic and silliness has come from you, in the form of superficial retorts and spurious grandstanding. and for the record i am starting to have doubts about your sincerity, you are only taking potshots here and there and not looking at any issue in any sort of depth. therefore i pity your tragic input.

Originally posted by kyue
I don't know why you're calling him Darwin there. Darwin never said anything like that (as long as I know). That's so unreasonable he gets blame for other people's misinterpretations or misquotes. That's just so wrong 😠

Earlier in the thread (page 4), he made references to "natural selection", a term introduced by Charles Darwin in "The Origin of Species".

Personally, I think it's ridiculous to claim that a person armed with a gun, killing an innocent animal is practicing "natural selection".

My post was intended as sarcasm. 😛

Originally posted by eldragonfly
That's a rather speciesist remark, essentially worthless.

It is all I have to work with.

(I don't write my own material, some Latin dude did)

May I enquire as to your gender?

😀

Originally posted by Woodgie
It is all I have to work with.

(I don't write my own material, some Latin dude did)

May I enquire as to your gender?

😀

I think age is more relevant. I am convinced it will be below 25...

Originally posted by rbmorris
Earlier in the thread (page 4), he made references to "natural selection", a term introduced by Charles Darwin in "The Origin of Species".

Personally, I think it's ridiculous to claim that a person armed with a gun, killing an innocent animal is practicing "natural selection".

My post was intended as sarcasm. 😛

but the train is off the tracks.

Originally posted by Aiko
I think age is more relevant. I am convinced it will be below 25...

irrelevant. try again.

😛