Go back
Something seriously wrong here:

Something seriously wrong here:

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hopscotch
Actually... she was drunk...
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06283/728730-85.stm

If being drunk is an excuse for such retarded behaviour, then we should ban alcohol.
Goback read my posts. You may then have an idea that I do know what I'm talking about??.... No offence intended.

Did you get to the bookies??

-m

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stocken
Just burn them
and leave their bloody corps to rot.
Great idea!!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ExpressiveOutburst
Great idea!!!
😞

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stocken
Obviously, I'm not advocating giving convicted sex offenders (or otherwise
dangerous people) enough freedom to be able to repeat their offence.

But, perhaps I'm wrong. Perhaps there is nothing that can be done to
prevent these things from happening, so why even try, eh? Just burn them
and leave their bloody corps to rot. That'll at least stop that particular loony.

I give up.
The possibility of being burned alive at the stake is a deterrant for paedophilic crimes like these. They should show the burning live on television too. There should be a competition where the lucky winner gets to light the fire.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stocken
But, perhaps I'm wrong. Perhaps there is nothing that can be done to
prevent these things from happening, so why even try, eh? Just burn them
and leave their bloody corps to rot. That'll at least stop those particular
loonies.
You know, there's this South African sociopath, Antonie Wessels, quite a charming character actually, dry wit, who murdered a few people (ate one man's thigh) en route to Pretoria, his mission being to murder his step-father, whose sexual abuse of young Antonie is the obvious cause of the trouble. The problem, though, as the sympathetic psychiatrist explained, is that no matter how understandable the cause, sociopathy cannot be cured, because the person is so badly and permanently damaged. Maybe science could change that some day, I hope so, but until then such people do need to be separated from everyone else.

I sympathise with people whose desires lead them to perform abhorrent acts. Try the book "Killing for Company" some time. Unfortunately it doesn't really answer any questions, just opens your eyes to more horror than you thought existed...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hopscotch
The possibility of being burned alive at the stake is a deterrant for paedophilic crimes like these. They should show the burning live on television too. There should be a competition where the lucky winner gets to light the fire.
I think the family of the victim should get that oppurtunity.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ExpressiveOutburst
I think the family of the victim should get that oppurtunity.
It wouldn't do them any good. It would make monsters out of them, too. You'd wish that on them?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mikelom
Goback read my posts. You may then have an idea that I do know what I'm talking about??.... No offence intended.

Did you get to the bookies??

-m
You lucked out with a statistic, that's not evidence of knowledge. I'd bet you she has a history of heart problems in her family too... except I never gamble. 😉

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hopscotch
The possibility of being burned alive at the stake is a deterrant for paedophilic crimes like these. They should show the burning live on television too. There should be a competition where the lucky winner gets to light the fire.
Sorry to dissapoint you, but never once in history has deterrent actions like
these had anything but short term effects. Possibly even damaging, as it
makes us sort of numb, or perhaps familiar to the horror.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Marinkatomb
What's good about that? 😕
It proves it to be in jest, just video trickery, nobody kicked a real baby.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hopscotch
Sorry. I have absolutely no pity.

If she had extreme post natal depression then it would have manifested itself before this act (she has had four children) and therefore she was a blithering idiot for trying to cover it up and should be held accountable anyway.
The number of children you have and time between birth and onset of PND is different in every case. Mental health issues cannot be compared and given time limits. PND is a complex one and can manifest itself in many ways. A woman with this illness does not always realise she has it, as with many mental health problems.
I'm not defending her actions, as I said before, we do not have all the details, therefore we are in no position to make judgement. 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
It wouldn't do them any good. It would make monsters out of them, too. You'd wish that on them?
Only if they wanted to do it. Some families would probably want to do something to feel like they have got justice, but obviously not all of them would.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stocken
Sorry to dissapoint you, but never once in history has deterrent actions like
these had anything but short term effects.
Prove it. Name all the people who haven't murdered other people in the short term because it suddenly became punishable by death.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Pawn Qween
I'm not defending her actions, as I said before, we do not have all the details, therefore we are in no position to make judgement. 🙂
Exactly! 🙂

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hopscotch
Prove it.
It's still happening.

Addition: I should have written: "...but, possibly, short term effects".