Originally posted by Starrmansnap.
Bell sucks my willow. Only a centuary this innings will change my opinion of him.
by the way what are the opinions on strauss. one hit wonder or just having a bad patch. to be honest when he was doing his business last summer, England were playing teams not nearly as good as Australia. Is he really that good.
Originally posted by Freddie2004I think Strauss is quality, but like Bell, he needs a big score to stop himself being relegated to my bad books.
snap.
by the way what are the opinions on strauss. one hit wonder or just having a bad patch. to be honest when he was doing his business last summer, England were playing teams not nearly as good as Australia. Is he really [b] that good.[/b]
EDIT: Well done to Vaughan!
WI and NZ aren't amazing bowling attacks, but Strauss did well in SA, and you can't argue that Pollock isn't great.
I think Strauss his having a bad run, because he struggled against Bangladesh!
Bell, is unproven, but I hardly think the failures at Lords counts (unless we sack everyone except Pietersen). He is a nice replacement for Thorpe in a classical batsman kind of way - less gung ho than KP or Freddie.
Originally posted by VargDid Bell not make three half centuries in his first three Test innings? He has battled superbly today, I am not a fan of his, but he has worked through a tough patch with real dedication...
WI and NZ aren't amazing bowling attacks, but Strauss did well in SA, and you can't argue that Pollock isn't great.
I think Strauss his having a bad run, because he struggled against Bangladesh!
Bell, is unproven, but I hardly think the failures at Lords counts (unless we sack everyone except Pietersen). He is a nice replacement for Thorpe in a classical batsman kind of way - less gung ho than KP or Freddie.