@moonbus saidTry it again, now that more than a couple people know about it.
Fewer people care about this issue than I expected (I did not cast a vote, btw). But those few appear to care a lot about it. It seems a curious issue to take issue with. Much less significant than, for example, the drumming out of Duchess a while back.
@moonbus saidYes the last line. That there were many who had no idea the poll was on. That seems clear.
I don't dispute the result. More people voted for automatic outing than all other options together. Do the math: 63% of 8 votes is 5 people who voted for automatic outing. 13% of 8 is one; one person voted for optional outing. Two people voted to keep as is. No one voted for 'no strong opinion on the matter.'
@FMF wondered what would constitute a quorum, and I guessed that ...[text shortened]... wonder whether people knew about it and didn't care enough to vote, or did not know about it at all.
While people who were conducive to their side were probably promptly notified. What's interesting to note, is that among those they did notify, apparently not all of them voted their way. Perhaps the Inquisition this leads to may cause some to see reason.
If you had an election that was not publicized and no one showed up, would that be a consensus in any meaningful sense? Was there a Quorum, or anything close to it? Not at all.