Originally posted by Suzianne
And you, sir, are a liar.
This is what I said (in the post you were responding to). It is a series of statements/and rhetorical question that lay out what my opinion is. Here it is:
"I always feel free here at RHP to decide whether I want to speak my mind or not. I think thumbs up and thumbs down are meaningless. I think they still would be, even if they weren't anonymous. I don't see them as people speaking their minds. No one has proposed to curtail anyone's freedom to speak their minds nor to curtail their freedom to give thumbs up or down.
If I, say, gave your last post a thumbs down and you knew it, how do you think that would have curtailed my freedom? If I didn't want you to know that I wanted to give you a thumbs down and so therefore didn't use the thumbs down feature, how would that be a "restriction of freedom of speech". I would still have the freedom to speak my mind about your post, wouldn't I?"
What is it you think I am lying about? The above text is me expressing my point of view. Are you saying that I am lying about what my point of view is, and that my point of view is in some way different?