Go back
Is it posible, kramnik cheating?

Is it posible, kramnik cheating?

Only Chess

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://www.chessbase.com/eventarticle.asp?newsid=3370

I personaly think that if the proper measures are taken and kramnik statrs loosing, he was cheating!!

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock

My respect for Topalov has just gone through the floor (via the toilet.)

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Superman
http://www.chessbase.com/eventarticle.asp?newsid=3370

I personaly think that if the proper measures are taken and kramnik statrs loosing, he was cheating!!
1. When Kramnik is not in the bathroom it could be checked to ensure nothing was amiss.

2. Kramnik himself could be checked to ensure he is carrying no inappropriate devices.

3. It is unlikely that is the short time available that a small hand held computer could match Kramniks play so to risk all would be pointless.

Perhaps he has a bladder infection!

When I'm playing OTB I get nervous and visit the restroom an unreasonably large number of times (maybe 6 to 10 times over a 3 hour game). You have to take my word for this but I assure you I am not cheating whilst there.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

There are a million and one explanations for this, and ways to fix it.

So why the big threat and mass media press release?

Because Topalov can't take responsibility for his match situation, so blames someone or something else, and wants to run away, under the smoke-screen of a cheating accusation.

I hope he runs away to the world of draughts, frankly.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Err, and I guess the blunder made by Kramnik in game 2 that Topalov failed to see was also suggested by the supposedly used computer or whatever else assistance?

It's not like he's playing brilliantly. If Topalov would've played correctly the score wouldve been 2.5-1.5 in Topa's favor.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Thread 18804 Someone needs to tell team Toppy that there's a ban on this sorta thing. There's always some Bozo doesn't get the word!

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by leisurelysloth
Thread 18804 Someone needs to tell team Toppy that there's a ban on this sorta thing. There's always some Bozo doesn't get the word!
I understand this applies to acusations made to RHP users.

I am not accusing Kramnik of cheating, I am saying that if he statrs loosing my personal oppinion is he was. it is a conditional(IF).

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Superman
I understand this applies to acusations made to RHP users.

I am not accusing Kramnik of cheating, I am saying that if he statrs loosing my personal oppinion is he was. it is a conditional(IF).
This has nothing to do with Kramnik and everything to do with Topalov.

At its best, its an immoral psychological tactic trying to destablise Kramnik. At its worst, its an excuse to walk away from impending defeat. But probably it's a bit of both, whilst Topalov sees how the next few games goes.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TommyC
This has nothing to do with Kramnik and everything to do with Topalov.

At its best, its an immoral psychological tactic trying to destablise Kramnik. At its worst, its an excuse to walk away from impending defeat. But probably it's a bit of both, whilst Topalov sees how the next few games goes.
So what do do you think about the bathrom visits?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Superman
I understand this applies to acusations made to RHP users.

I am not accusing Kramnik of cheating, I am saying that if he statrs loosing my personal oppinion is he was. it is a conditional(IF).
Ah! Come on. Kramnik has a rating circa 2800 that he certainly did not get to by cheating.

If he starts losing its probably because he is having a bad day and if fed up of such accusations.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Superman
I understand this applies to acusations made to RHP users.

I am not accusing Kramnik of cheating, I am saying that if he statrs loosing my personal oppinion is he was. it is a conditional(IF).
'twas a joke, Super. It's hard to take this seriously when they don't have anything more than just an excessive number of potty breaks.

There is a good point in there though. We've got a ban on public cheating accusations for a reason. These things should be discussed behind closed doors, not tried in the court of public opinion prior to all the facts being determined. Team Toppy could learn from this....

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Superman
So what do do you think about the bathrom visits?
He needed a pee.........

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
He needed a pee.........
hehe, very very very often then 😀

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Superman
So what do do you think about the bathrom visits?
I think, how the hell should I know? That's not the point I'm making. If they have a complaint, make it in private and only threaten to leave if its not dealt with properly. Thiat is the proper way to handle these things; stop the clocks and call the arbiter, by analogy.

Not howl out to the whole world like a little girl who got hurt and now wants to go home.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.