Another thread about abiogenesis and evolution.

@KellyJay said
The question is about information, you may try to change the subject. Nothing about proving God, only God can prove God, I cannot do that.

It is a simple question about the arrangement of matter so that highly specified, very precise work, with extremely tight tolerances from replication to the activation of our sences and so on can occur.

Information is the elimination of uncertainty which is chaos. Do you think informational instructions can arise by chance?

Actually I DO think complexity can come from simpler molecules.

Of course to you, being regularly programmed by your religion, IMPOSSIBLE. DO THE MATH.

@sonhouse said
Actually I DO think complexity can come from simpler molecules.

Of course to you, being regularly programmed by your religion, IMPOSSIBLE. DO THE MATH.

Why do you insist on bringing my religion into this? We are talking about information directing complexity, not complexity alone. If one person is pushing a religious idea into this discussion, it is you, trying to keep mine out of it as if I were pushing it. Is it easier for you to accuse me of something I’m not doing so you can avoid the actual topic?

@KellyJay said
Why do you insist on bringing my religion into this? We are talking about information directing complexity, not complexity alone. If one person is pushing a religious idea into this discussion, it is you, trying to keep mine out of it as if I were pushing it. Is it easier for you to accuse me of something I’m not doing so you can avoid the actual topic?

You are the one whose bottom line will always be god did it.

@sonhouse said
You are the one whose bottom line will always be god did it.

Actually, you bring God into discussions more than I do.

@KellyJay said
Actually, you bring God into discussions more than I do.

You are the one totally in with Jesus.

@sonhouse said
You are the one totally in with Jesus.

Yes, and amen.

@KellyJay said
Yes, and amen.

Which means you are not an unbiased observer since you have a permanent agenda to spread the word of your man made religion.

@sonhouse said
Which means you are not an unbiased observer since you have a permanent agenda to spread the word of your man made religion.

Do you know anyone who is not bias? You might as well complain people who breath have opinions.

@KellyJay said
Do you know anyone who is not bias? You might as well complain people who breath have opinions.

We really have nothing to talk about.

@sonhouse said
We really have nothing to talk about.

You only have one thing you want to talk about: the religious beliefs of others; nothing else matters. So you jump into threads that have no mention of religion and try to hijack them to make them all about religion. I don't think you are capable of talking about anything else; you are so fixated.

@KellyJay said
You only have one thing you want to talk about: the religious beliefs of others; nothing else matters. So you jump into threads that have no mention of religion and try to hijack them to make them all about religion. I don't think you are capable of talking about anything else; you are so fixated.

Yep, total obsession with truth.

@sonhouse said
Yep, total obsession with truth.

If that were true you would engage in questions asked, instead of diagnosing the motivation of the one asking questions.

@KellyJay said
If that were true you would engage in questions asked, instead of diagnosing the motivation of the one asking questions.

Considering I don't have the Phd chops to answer questions, go find someone else to show your abject superiority.

@sonhouse said
Considering I don't have the Phd chops to answer questions, go find someone else to show your abject superiority.

You think spotting something done with intelligence requires a PhD?

@KellyJay said
You think spotting something done with intelligence requires a PhD?

It certainly helps because as you don't seem to know, the work it takes to GET a Phd means they are trained to spot issues and then bring them up to be peer reviewed. I bet you forgot about THAT bit too in your dissing science in general.