Originally posted by Frogspondence
Moon in the sky thing from Earth is an excellent point. Didn't think of/catch that.
All (or nearly all at worst) of the moon landing pictures were taken around local dawn or dusk with the sun on the horizon (but risen/not set; the sun is in the sky). They always have to take the pictures facing away from the Sun for brightness reasons. Yes there ...[text shortened]... not seeing anymore posts from the anti-moon landing people, so maybe we convinced them? 😕
Don't hold your breath🙂
There is one idiot here, an otherwise very intelligent person, who insists she has inside knowledge of fakery, I think she is deranged, she just spouts hatred of American science mainly, I think her (I think it's female, not sure about that) main stance stems from that hatred. Hatred clouds one's thinking. Not much coming from her camp lately for which I am thankful.
When it comes to the lunar sky, think about the sun's energy level, what reaches the moon's surface is 1355 watts per square meter. That is several times more than EVER reaches the Earth's surface. In terms of square inches, that is almost one watt per square inch, which is roughly the size of the standard camera, film or CCD camcorder. Think about the light levels a modern camcorder can make decent pictures in, you are beginning to count individual photons there and on the moon, you aim a camera like that at the sun, it would not be long before the sensor would be fried, so it's no wonder there is not much in the way of sun pictures from the moon. When we look at the sun, for instance, I have a pair of binoculars, 80X20, and I can see sunspots directly with them but I have to use a filter that would do a welder proud to keep from damaging my eyes. That concentrates all the sun's energy from about 250 square mm onto about a 3 mm spot inside the eye. If I was to be looking at the sun on the moon's surface, I would be cramming about 1/3 of a watt in a 3mm sized hole in my eye where the pupil size is about 7 mm, or around 9 square mm, which would be the equivalent of about 37,000 watts per square meter, think how long it would take for that 1/3 watt to make a hole in your retina. So you can see why nobody was anxious to take photo's of the sun from the moon or even from the ISS.
The moon hoaxers have come up with the lamest excuses they call 'evidence' I ever heard. I think it must be a lot easier to invent UFO evidence than the lame crap I hear from them.