Originally posted by twhitehead
[b]Also it is claimed that there are no stars in the fake photos.
That is correct and how it should be. If you have ever tried taking photos of the moon you will probably also have no stars in your photos. It is because the contrast between moon light and star light is so great that the camera does not pick up the stars. (I don't know if astronauts on the moon can see the stars.)[/b]
To clarify the no stars thing:
1: The moon does not have an atmosphere, so light is not scattered. Therefore the sky on the moon is black even during the day. The moon landing pictures were taken during the day (hence the shadows). So it isn't light reflecting off the moon that is making it too bright to see stars, it is the fact that the sun is in the sky. Just like on Earth, you can't see the stars during the day, and on the moon the same thing is true. The SUN is just too bright.
2: Because of the brightness of the Sun and the fact that space suits and whatnot are white (reflecting a lot of light), the moon photos were all taken with very fast exposure times and with the apertures on the cameras less open to keep out a lot of light. With these sorts of camera settings you would never see stars anyway. When you want to take a picture of stars (at night) you open the aperture wide and have a long exposure time so you can capture enough light to make them visible.
3: The Earth, as seen from the Moon, ought to give off more (reflected) light than the Moon as seen from Earth does, just because of the size in the sky and the atmosphere. No idea how much that matters to illumination as you would never be able to see stars given the exposure times and the SUN even if the Earth weren't there, but it is yet another thing to think about.
Anyway, I just wanted to point out that it isn't light reflected off the moon surface that is the problem, but you definitely should not be surprised there are no stars.
-----------------------------------------------------
Oh, and I just remembered another of the "must be two light sources" pictures. There is a picture somewhere of an astronaut in the shadow of the lander, and the astronaut is illuminated despite being in shadow. People say there have to be two light sources for that to happen. Actually it happens because of the reflection of light off the lander and the soil.
The very top of this page has a good example of this done with a toy moon lander:
http://www.iangoddard.com/moon01.htm
I suspect when he finds his picture, it will be something like this. Not that it isn't weird, but it is just a neat thing about being on the moon, not something proving it was a hoax. Also, have you ever been outside in a field that is
completely covered in new fallen snow? That is sort of like the surface of the moon. We can have pretty reflective days even here on Earth.
Anyway, it is just one more neat thing, and one more reason to believe NASA anyway. All the so-called "problems" with the lunar photos are things we would EXPECT, and with all these things you would expect after thinking about, but contrary to common experience, what are the chances they wouldn't have screwed something up if they were trying to make a hoax with that many little easter eggs.