Site Ideas
30 Mar 08
30 Mar 08
Originally posted by Freddie2008General is usually full of alot of threads that I swear after two minutes of reading I do not have enough bread crumbs to find my way home.
Take it to general! 😛 Seems silly to have so many forums. Humour just comes under General I think,
That is why it is called GENERAL...cause I don't think a Seargent could screw it up that badly.
Although the only other option is for every clan to just have it...kinda screws the non subs though
Dave
30 Mar 08
My personal preference would be: necessary forums such as Announcements (postings by admins only)
Help
Only Chess
Site Ideas (rigid format, one thread per idea, no off-topic allowed so that site designers can assess the demand)
and three other groups only:
Humorous and lighthearted stuff
Serious and jokes-aside discussion stuff
Entertaining brawls and arguments about site personalities
The bigger the forum, the more activity it gets, OK it's more work for the moderators but it might help to keep the help-seeking newbies from walking into a major drama ...
That's my 2c worth, I'm aware that nobody on this site would agree but that's OK - I'm used to being in a minority ... 🙄
30 Mar 08
Originally posted by MissOleumWhile we're at it, should we resubtitle "Clans" forum now that goading is viewed as harassment?
My personal preference would be: necessary forums such as Announcements (postings by admins only)
Help
Only Chess
Site Ideas (rigid format, one thread per idea, no off-topic allowed so that site designers can assess the demand)
and three other groups only:
Humorous and lighthearted stuff
Serious and jokes-aside discussion stuff
Entertaining brawl ...[text shortened]... hat nobody on this site would agree but that's OK - I'm used to being in a minority ... 🙄
"Taunt, goad or ridicule rival clans, or just discuss this team based feature."
We should remove the "Taunt, goad or ridicule rival clans" in line with current moderation policy of not allowing ANY goading, ANY ridicule and absolutely NO taunting
Have you 2c on that thought?
D
30 Mar 08
Originally posted by RagnorakOK, my 2c worth again:
While we're at it, should we resubtitle "Clans" forum now that goading is viewed as harassment?
"Taunt, goad or ridicule rival clans, or just discuss this team based feature."
We should remove the "Taunt, goad or ridicule rival clans" in line with current moderation policy of not allowing ANY goading, ANY ridicule and absolutely NO taunting
Have you 2c on that thought?
D
"Taunt, goad or ridicule rival CLANS" is fine, personal attacks on people purely because they happen to be in particular clans is not. That's just a backdoor way of harassing people.
Am I the only one here who can see the difference?
30 Mar 08
Originally posted by MissOleumhere is your 4c change back😉
OK, my 2c worth again:
"Taunt, goad or ridicule rival CLANS" is fine, personal attacks on people purely because they happen to be in particular clans is not. That's just a backdoor way of harassing people.
Am I the only one here who can see the difference?
30 Mar 08
Originally posted by MissOleumNot what I was talking about.
OK, my 2c worth again:
"Taunt, goad or ridicule rival CLANS" is fine, personal attacks on people purely because they happen to be in particular clans is not. That's just a backdoor way of harassing people.
Am I the only one here who can see the difference?
Taunting a clan leader because his members are throwing clan games seems like a legitimate goad to me. Maybe you should ask the admin to clarify if they want to remove goading from the clan forum if you consider inter clan goading based on referring to clan games played to be personal harassment and constitute "personal attacks".
If you feel that your personality doesn't sit with the concept of interclan goading that goes on in the clan forum, then you could steer clear. Phlab has often said that he goes nowhere near debates for similar reasons.
D