19 Jun '06 22:41>
Originally posted by AikoUnbump?
Unbump.
Originally posted by CoconutYour a scag Coconut. If you don't want to subscribe you should reject your clan memebership and cut your number of games down. Otherwise you are an abuser of a system.
If you make xanthos be nice to me, I'll resubscribe.
Customer service here is terrible. 😞
Originally posted by marinakatombThen the way around that is:
It's been brought up before and i agree in principal, however it has to be considered that this will mean that some people will end up playing games in round two while they are still playing games in round one. If the group size is quite big, then they might end up with a few more games than they really want. I would imagine this would be more of a prob ...[text shortened]... but needs to be considered all the same as some players only play a limited amount of games...
Originally posted by marinakatombIf the people to progress has been decided, then people going through to the next round really shouldn't have too many games (any?) remaining from the previous round.
It's been brought up before and i agree in principal, however it has to be considered that this will mean that some people will end up playing games in round two while they are still playing games in round one. If the group size is quite big, then they might end up with a few more games than they really want.
Originally posted by CoconutI don't see why people keep pushing the Tournament Mod idea. There is no need for them as people can easily make error whereas an automation cannot. All the things you have spoken of, removing people rated too high, moving onto the next round when the remaining games are insignificant etc. can all be performed programatically.
The easiest way to accomplish this would be to assign a group of volunteers at "tournament mods" these mods could start and progress tournaments, and remove people from tournaments. This would also allow members to request that someone in a banded tournament be looked at if the player is clearly at an artificial low rating.
Originally posted by zebanoYou'd sure think so. And yet, tournaments will sit for weeks or even months waiting on games which are (1) completely irrelevant to the tournament result, and (2) do not include any of the players who will be continuing on to the next round. Tournament 959 for instance.... 😕
..moving onto the next round when the remaining games are insignificant etc. can all be performed programatically.
Originally posted by darvlayIts amazing what one will go to, to avoid doing anything even mildly constructive...Thread 32358
Too bad Russ hasn't replied in here. Makes me think it will never happen.
Originally posted by leisurelyslothIf you want his attention that badly, send feedback.
You'd sure think so. And yet, tournaments will sit for weeks or even months waiting on games which are (1) completely irrelevant to the tournament result, and (2) do not include any of the players who will be continuing on to the next round. Tournament 959 for instance.... 😕
Hellooooooooooo! Russ, are you there?
Originally posted by leisurelyslothHe always has it up, well near enough. I've sent abit of feedback in the past few days and he has replied pretty swiftly to it. Just be patient, there may have been alot sent at the same time. 🙂
I already did that, but the slacker's got his vacation flag set. He's probably lounging on some tropical isle, drinking something with a little umbrella in it, etc.... ðŸ˜