Abiogenesis

@kellyjay said
I think He has left fingerprints upon the universe, but some simply refuse to acknowledge them no matter how painfully obvious they are. Any excuse will do in denying Him.

Does the evidence you see of these "fingerprints upon the universe" also make it "painfully obvious" that other religions may be true or does it only contribute to the corroboration of yours?

@kellyjay said
I think He has left fingerprints upon the universe, but some simply refuse to acknowledge them no matter how painfully obvious they are. Any excuse will do in denying Him.

You always refuse to debate this "evidence".
You just state arguments which were debunked decades ago.

The evidence points to there being NO GODS.

@bigdoggproblem said
It's your sentence; I'm just parsing it. If you meant to say something else, you probably should just do that now.

I'm trying to, but it's hard keeping up with all the something elses you keep saying.

So far we have dirt, and life. We also know abiogenesis is bunk.

The only logical explanation is that life was created. Otherwise one can spin theories about the origin of life for the next four billion years. Irrational!

@wolfgang59 said
You always refuse to debate this "evidence".
You just state arguments which were debunked decades ago.

The evidence points to there being NO GODS.

Depends on what you are looking at with what mindset, the evidence doesn't say
that, just you.

@secondson said
Having difficulty following the thread?

It appears I misread your post. My bad.

@kellyjay said
Depends on what you are looking at with what mindset, the evidence doesn't say
that, just you.

Just me?

@wolfgang59 said
Just me?

I sure there’s more, but you are who I am talking to, and it was your comment I replied to.

@kellyjay said
I sure there’s more, but you are who I am talking to, and it was your comment I replied to.

So "you" would have sufficed.
"just you" was a lie.

@wolfgang59 said
So "you" would have sufficed.
"just you" was a lie.

‘You’ can be plural even if the word ‘just’ is infront of it.

@wolfgang59 said
So "you" would have sufficed.
"just you" was a lie.

I can see your not up to having a discussion with someone who disagrees with you without seeking for some way to insult.

@fmf said
Does the evidence you see of these "fingerprints upon the universe" also make it "painfully obvious" that other religions may be true or does it only contribute to the corroboration of yours?

If someone else wants to defend their religion by evidence let them.

@kellyjay said
If someone else wants to defend their religion by evidence let them.

I didn't ask you that. What is your answer to the question I did ask?

@dj2becker said
‘You’ can be plural even if the word ‘just’ is infront of it.

But Kellyjay wasn't using "you" in the plural. He just admitted that.

@kellyjay said
I can see your not up to having a discussion with someone who disagrees with you without seeking for some way to insult.

How have I insulted you?
It is you, trying to belittle me, by saying "just you".

@fmf said
I didn't ask you that. What is your answer to the question I did ask?

I don’t care! If someone thinks that the evidence fits their beliefs let them speak up. To be clear if it fits another’s beliefs good on them, it is not my job, or desire to worry about others faith to make them appear valid. If you want to go for it!