Originally posted by robbie carrobieSaying he would kill to protect the lives of his wife and family is not an example of "ignorance, prejudice and bigotry". The only example of "ignorance, prejudice and bigotry" that you offered to substantiate your accusation that he had the same moral disposition as a murdering lynch mob was his disagreements with you about JW doctrines.
It was not the only example as you have erroneously assumed, he also stated that violence was a justification in itself as his support for war is evidence of. He of course tried to soften this by making references to the defence of his family, oh diddums, all cuddly wuddley, but he has shown support for and justification for violence in the form of war which is something entirely different
Originally posted by robbie carrobieEven with the word "equally" gone, you have continued to suggest that there is "no difference at all" between the "ignorance, prejudice and bigotry" you say he has towards your group and the "ignorance, prejudice and bigotry" of lynch mob murderers.
He keeps regurgitating my original statement which I have retracted and have evidence that I have retracted. Have I or have I not retracted the statement that he is equally as bigoted, prejudiced etc or have I not?
Originally posted by FMFNo one is saying that it is, what was actually said is that its an example of the justification for the utilisation of violence. Not only that the portrayal is not even accurate, he has shown a moral justification for warfare.
Saying he would kill to protect the lives of his wife and family is not an example of "ignorance, prejudice and bigotry". The only example of "ignorance, prejudice and bigotry" that you offered to substantiate your accusation that he had the same moral disposition as a murdering lynch mob was his disagreements with you about JW doctrines.
Originally posted by FMFI have continually asked for evidence to help me demonstrate to what extent his bias, prejudices and ignorance differ and for what reasons, so far nothing has been forthcoming.
Even with the word "equally" gone, you have continued to suggest that there is "no difference at all" between the "ignorance, prejudice and bigotry" you say he has towards your group and the "ignorance, prejudice and bigotry" of lynch mob murderers.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe only "evidence" of "ignorance, prejudice and bigotry" that you offered up to justify your accusation that his was "the same moral disposition as a murdering lynch mob" was his criticisms of JW doctrines
No one is saying that it is, what was actually said is that its an example of the justification for the utilisation of violence. Not only that the portrayal is not even accurate, he has shown a moral justification for warfare.
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFyes but its better than nothing, isn't it. You have provided no evidence to the contrary.
The only "evidence" of "ignorance, prejudice and bigotry" that you offered up to justify your accusation that his was "the same moral disposition as a murdering lynch mob" was his criticisms of JW doctrines
Originally posted by FMFprejudice is prejudice, indeed what makes one prejudice different from another. This is why I have asked you for evidence, so far nothing has been forthcoming.
What "prejudice, bigotry and ignorance" are you claiming he has that you say is the same as a racist murderer's "moral disposition"? It is you who has to provide the evidence.
Originally posted by FMFIt remains to be seen doesn't it, if you can provide any insight on the matter in the form of evidence then please do so now. This may help us to make a distinction between divesgeesters prejudices and those of a lynch mob.
So his criticisms of JW doctrines is "evidence", to your way of thinking, that he has the same moral disposition as a murderer?