Originally posted by googlefudgeYou also forget that the Bible was also applied as a history book. Slavery was widespread across the earth in those days, most slaves were taken as "spoils of war". For one people to stand up against slavery during a time when it was a common practice worldwide would make them targets worldwide. Jews already had enough on their plate without giving them that too. I believe slavery was condoned as a concession. I do not believe the Bible actually ever "advocated" it.
No we can't move on.
If the mosaic laws ever applied and were ever proscribed or condoned by your god then
that god is liable to be judged by those laws.
Those laws not only condone but advocate slavery.
We recognise that slavery is not, and never was moral.
Thus if your god ever endorsed (let alone authored) the mosaic law then your god wa ...[text shortened]...
Your god is evil. Your holy book proves it.
We are thus lucky it's also non-existent.
My God is not evil. And my holy book proves that. Your "proof" that God is evil simply does not stand. I wish you and your peers would remember that logic fails in the face of reality. Logic says bumblebees cannot fly, either.
Originally posted by ZahlanziI approve this message.
you know it is not. you simply take the opinion of one of the most fundamentalist and disconnected with reality posters on this website (who happens to be a christian) in order to trigger a response from normal christians/theists/atheists.
yes, fmf, it is wrong to own slaves.
Originally posted by FMFThis is why I try to stay out of these sorts of threads. Using some form of twisted logic to pick nits.
This has not been discussed. It is not the topic at hand. I therefore have not failed to "distinguish" anything. The only "emotional" response there has been here is your apparent anger at being forced out into the open about your views on the legitimacy of slavery.
[b]There are many types of modern slavery, from abduction, to sex trafficking, none of which w sex trafficking"? I have not discussed either with you. There has been no "slander".[/b]
I don't as a rule like lawyers, either, for many of the same reasons.
Originally posted by FMFI doubt it.
First, I don't consider myself to be an atheist. Secondly, it is not me but robbie corrobie who claims that twenty first century Christians are permitted by God to own slaves, in so far as if they are permitted by local secular laws to do so. Do you think that robbie's claim could "turn people against God"?
The only people he could "turn against God" are already against God.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo you accept that the moral guidance given in the 'divinely inspired' OT is different from that given in the 'divinely inspired' NT?
its a different system, the former being based in mandates, the latter on the exercise of conscience. Principles still apply, but the Law was no longer practised.