Originally posted by @romans1009Didn't you promise to stop abusing personal information?
When are you going to start ignoring me? Didn’t you promise to do that over a month ago?
Again, you are void of God. God is an outside agent to you. You validate this every time you spit your spite and vitriol. Where is God in any of that?!
Shame on you,
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeBut it's ok when Dive and FMF do it? The Ghost's bias knickers are showing...
Didn't you promise to stop abusing personal information?
Again, you are void of God. God is an outside agent to you. You validate this every time you spit your spite and vitriol. Where is God in any of that?!
Shame on you,
Originally posted by @dj2beckerThey were not threats. They were a clear warning of what would happen (and has happened) if you continued to abuse personal information shared by other users. Any sensible person, having revealed their real name would immediately stop abusing other people's personal data. Why you have decided not to do that is beyond me.
Maybe if you make some threats about emailing people he knows in real life he will back off? 😵
#stalkedbyaghost
Like I said, you reap what you sow. As a Christian, I thought you would be aware of that concept.
1 edit
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeSo warming me of what would happen is not a threat? What has happened? How do you know that Daniel is my real name?
They were not threats. They were a clear warning of what would happen (and has happened) if you continued to abuse personal information shared by other users. Any sensible person, having revealed their real name would immediately stop abusing other people's personal data. Why you have decided not to do that is beyond me.
Like I said, you reap what you sow. As a Christian, I thought you would be aware of that concept.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerStrange how you conflate 'consequences' as a threat.
So warming me of what would happen is not a threat? What has happened? How do you know that Daniel is my real name?
If a sign tells you not to touch a fence as it is electrified, and then you stupidly touch the fence anyway, was the sign threatening you or making you aware what the consequences would be of touching the fence?
Many people here are tired of you casually abusing personal information. I made it clear to you that I would no longer accept such cretinous behaviour and would reciprocate next time you did so. Which part of that did you not understand? No point worrying about it after the event. All you needed to do was behave like a normal person and there wouldn't have been a problem. You also have nothing to worry about if you haven't posted anything here you're not ashamed of.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeI haven't seen you give the same warning to Dive and FMF. We all know why that is.
Strange how you conflate 'consequences' as a threat.
If a sign tells you not to touch a fence as it is electrified, and then you stupidly touch the fence anyway, was the sign threatening you or making you aware what the consequences would be of touching the fence?
Many people here are tired of you casually abusing personal information. I made ...[text shortened]... You also have nothing to worry about if you haven't posted anything here you're not ashamed of.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerHave you posted anything here you're ashamed of?
I haven't seen you give the same warning to Dive and FMF. We all know why that is.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeNo. Maybe you should ask that question to Dive.
Have you posted anything here you're ashamed of?
Originally posted by @romans1009Do you have much knowledge regarding the different supervisory roles within mental health? Can you confidently say that there are no roles in which a person would have a lot of time to spend on the internet?
Posting a lot in here - hours upon hours upon hours every day - is obviously a sign of somebody with a ton of free time, not somebody in a supervisory position.
Not to mention (though I will anyway) the tit-for-tat nature of many of Ghost’s posts is indicative of an obsessive nutball.
Originally posted by @stellspalfieHis depth of knowledge when it comes to mental health is 'psychiatrists,' despite repeatedly telling him I am neither a psychiatrist nor do I manage such professionals. (My degree 'isn't' even in psychiatry! )
Do you have much knowledge regarding the different supervisory roles within mental health? Can you confidently say that there are no roles in which a person would have a lot of time to spend on the internet?
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeSo if your degree isn't even in psychiatry what exactly made you think you were qualified to claim that I was suffering from psychological abuse?
His depth of knowledge when it comes to mental health is 'psychiatrists,' despite repeatedly telling him I am neither a psychiatrist nor do I manage such professionals. (My degree 'isn't' even in psychiatry! )
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI didn't.
So if your degree isn't even in psychiatry what exactly made you think you were qualified to claim that I was suffering from psychological abuse?
You described a situation of psychological abuse that involved brainwashing, and further said that you can' take the man out of the cult but not the cult of the man."
For you then to say that the situation of psychological abuse you yourself had described was 'not' in fact psychological abuse was bizarre in the extreme.
1 edit
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeI shared personal details with which you decided to troll me, by saying I was psychologically abused. I never claimed that I felt in any way abused.
I didn't.
You described a situation of psychological abuse that involved brainwashing, and further said that you can' take the man out of the cult but not the cult of the man."
For you then to say that the situation of psychological abuse you yourself had described was 'not' in fact psychological abuse was bizarre in the extreme.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerAgain, you described a situation of brainwashing and control inside a cult that had a long-term effect on you, that perfectly fitted the common understanding of psychological abuse. Your lack of insight into what you described is entirely your own issue.
I shared personal details with which you decided to troll me, by saying I was psychologically abused. I never claimed that I felt in any way abused.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeIn order to illustrate what had happened to him, he shared a link to a website which had countless testimonies of former cult members and their stories of being psychologically, physically and sexually abused ~ and not a single testimony about people NOT being psychologically abused. He said it was a website run by people who had been "fortunate enough to escape". I looked at it. I read some of the testimonies. Why was I directed to that website?
Again, you described a situation of brainwashing and control inside a cult that had a long-term effect on you, that perfectly fitted the common understanding of psychological abuse. Your lack of insight into what you described is entirely your own issue.