Originally posted by EladarDo you think that a god figure who [1] tortures non-believers in a furnace for eternity as an angry form of revenge for their lack of belief, on one hand, and a god figure who [2] grants eternal life to certain people while all those who don't make the cut simply cease to exist, on the other, are gods with essentially the same nature? Or do you think that they appear to be completely different entities?
I've heard three different theories on the subject...
Traditional burn forever in fire and brimstone [etc.]
Originally posted by FMFI think that God's nature is above us. We do not judge God one way or the other.
Do you think that a god figure who [1] tortures non-believers in a furnace for eternity as an angry form of revenge for their lack of belief, on one hand, and a god figure who [2] grants eternal life to certain people while all those who don't make the cut simply cease to exist, on the other, are gods with essentially the same nature? Or do you think that they appear to be completely different entities?
1 edit
Originally posted by EladarThat is not even remotely what I asked you. Look again. Do the two gods described have essentially the same nature? Or do you think that they could be more realistically described as being two completely different entities?
I think that God's nature is above us. We do not judge God one way or the other.
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFI assume you are describing God. If you are then I answered your question.
That is not even remotely what I asked you. Look again. Do the two gods described have essentially the same nature? Or do you think that they could be more realistically described as being two completely different entities?
I do not judge the nature of either.