11 Sep '09 18:08>1 edit
I googled "best evidence for evolution" and here are two statements I found there.
http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/340441
"Well, microevolution has been observed and documented in individual species adaptations, so that's pretty darned solid."
Solid? Like maybe it proves something? This is an insult to what little intelligence I have.
"For macroevolution, the fossil record, genetic similarity, etc are all convincing evidence."
Convincing evidence? How shallow can it get? Here, look into this microscope and see all these things on the head of a pin. Oh ya, fossils. The last time I checked there was no fossil record showing anything remotely resembling evolution. Genetic similarity. Boy, does that sound scientific. What are they talking about? Twins?
We have an entire universe right before our eyes. It's big. Really big. And all the evidence evolutionary scientists can muster up as proof for evolution can be seen on the head of a pin under a microscope.
It's all talk.
http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/340441
"Well, microevolution has been observed and documented in individual species adaptations, so that's pretty darned solid."
Solid? Like maybe it proves something? This is an insult to what little intelligence I have.
"For macroevolution, the fossil record, genetic similarity, etc are all convincing evidence."
Convincing evidence? How shallow can it get? Here, look into this microscope and see all these things on the head of a pin. Oh ya, fossils. The last time I checked there was no fossil record showing anything remotely resembling evolution. Genetic similarity. Boy, does that sound scientific. What are they talking about? Twins?
We have an entire universe right before our eyes. It's big. Really big. And all the evidence evolutionary scientists can muster up as proof for evolution can be seen on the head of a pin under a microscope.
It's all talk.