Originally posted by FMFBecause it would be futile.
Why not cite a few posts of mine that you believe were examples of me being duplicitous.
You claim you were a Christian. That would mean you were "once enlightened", but then you "fell away". Now it is impossible for you to repent. How are you ever going to know the truth again?
Life is substanceless without the Truth. See if you can digest that.
Originally posted by josephwYes, I used to be a Christian. So?
Because it would be futile.
You claim you were a Christian. That would mean you were "once enlightened", but then you "fell away". Now it is impossible for you to repent. How are you ever going to know the truth again?
Life is substanceless without the Truth. See if you can digest that.
But I asked you to give some examples from my posts of me being duplicitous. You've made the claim. It's not "futile" at all for you to back it up with something.
Originally posted by FMFSo, having erred from the truth, how are you ever going to know the truth again?
Yes, I used to be a Christian. So?
But I asked you to give some examples from my posts of me being duplicitous. You've made the claim. It's not "futile" at all for you to back it up with something.
Since it's your objective to be antagonistic toward the truth you once claimed to know, how is providing examples going to enlighten you?
Originally posted by josephwYou said I am duplicitous on this forum. Which post or posts are you able to cite?
So, having erred from the truth, how are you ever going to know the truth again?
Since it's your objective to be antagonistic toward the truth you once claimed to know, how is providing examples going to enlighten you?