18 Sep '11 08:38Originally posted by FMFI for one accept Dasa's insulting anti-social behaviour over the behavior
Reference to what terrorists are doing somewhere in the world has no bearing whatsoever on the acceptability of Dasa's insulting anti-social behaviour in this community.
18 Sep '11 09:08Originally posted by twhiteheadThat is right. The leadership of the Roman Catholic Church say they act
They are just less hung up on what 'that which was written' constitutes.
18 Sep '11 19:061 editOriginally posted by robbie carrobieyou righly state its not gods law, but church law which can be changed. even roman catholism knows full well,
its an unscriptutal practice though, forbidding to marry. Peter himself was married, God
himself states of Adam, is was not good for him to continue alone. Paul himself states
that marraige is to be honourable, among all. All that he states is that if a person can
remain single then he will do better, but if he cannot, for reasons of self co ...[text shortened]... the less, unless they resolve the
issue scripturally how can they hope to have Gods blessing?
18 Sep '11 21:26Originally posted by stokerif the word of God is inspired, as it claims to be, if the teachings are healthful as they
you righly state its not gods law, but church law which can be changed. even roman catholism knows full well,
but you are wrong instateing unless they resolve the issue how can they hope to have gods blessing. gods blessing is given for the life you lead not a religious dogma, no matter whos faith it is
18 Sep '11 21:33Originally posted by robbie carrobieAs I said earlier, there are married Catholic priests. Mandatory clerical celibacy is a matter of discipline; it is not doctrinal. Certainly no one is forbidden from marrying. For those priests who decide that the priesthood is no longer their vocation, they are permitted to leave the priesthood and marry.
its an unscriptutal practice though, forbidding to marry. Peter himself was married, God
himself states of Adam, is was not good for him to continue alone. Paul himself states
that marraige is to be honourable, among all. All that he states is that if a person can
remain single then he will do better, but if he cannot, for reasons of self co ...[text shortened]... the less, unless they resolve the
issue scripturally how can they hope to have Gods blessing?
18 Sep '11 22:303 editsOriginally posted by Conrau KIn reality Conrau what you did was to produce a list of provisos and exceptions to the norm, Eastern Catholic, Anglicans who associate themselves with Catholicism, those who were married prior to ordination etc etc . Is it true or is it not true that the Roman Catholic church forbids its priesthood to marry, or how are we to understand theses statements
As I said earlier, there are married Catholic priests. Mandatory clerical celibacy is a matter of discipline; it is not doctrinal. Certainly no one is forbidden from marrying. For those priests who decide that the priesthood is no longer their vocation, they are permitted to leave the priesthood and marry.
19 Sep '11 00:07Originally posted by robbie carrobieIn reality Conrau what you did was to produce a list of provisos and exceptions to the norm, Eastern Catholic, Anglicans who associate themselves with Catholicism, those who were married prior to ordination etc etc . Is it true or is it not true that the Roman Catholic church forbids its priesthood to marry, or how are we to understand theses statements
In reality Conrau what you did was to produce a list of provisos and exceptions to the norm, Eastern Catholic, Anglicans who associate themselves with Catholicism, those who were married prior to ordination etc etc . Is it true or is it not true that the Roman Catholic church forbids its priesthood to marry, or how are we to understand theses state ...[text shortened]... is the real testing of its effect, regardless of what it is termed and is our focus of concern.
19 Sep '11 01:07Originally posted by FMFTruth will be always insulting to those who embrace ignorance.
Reference to what terrorists are doing somewhere in the world has no bearing whatsoever on the acceptability of Dasa's insulting anti-social behaviour in this community.
19 Sep '11 01:14Originally posted by DasaI do not accept your subjective definitions of "truth" and "ignorance". It appears to be this fact that convinces you that you are justified in insulting fellow members of this community with "analogies" involving animals and excrement and mental handicaps. I'm sorry if it is my honesty and consistency in this matter that is causing you to be so abusive and anti-social.
Truth will be always insulting to those who embrace ignorance.
You are intelligent enough to know this.
But not honest enough to admit it.
19 Sep '11 03:20Originally posted by FMFlol
I do not accept your subjective definitions of "truth" and "ignorance". It appears to be this fact that convinces you that you are justified in insulting fellow members of this community with "analogies" involving animals and excrement and mental handicaps. I'm sorry if it is my honesty and consistency in this matter that is causing you to be so abusive and anti-social.
19 Sep '11 05:14Originally posted by RJHindsIts my understanding that the Catholic Church decided what to put in the Holy Bible.
That is right. The leadership of the Roman Catholic Church say they act
for Jesus Christ here on earth and have the authority to supliment or even
change what is written in the Holy Bible. I say they are wrong. One day
we shall all know the truth.
19 Sep '11 06:01Originally posted by twhiteheadTo read words blindly without at least one cross check( of some sort) is very dangerous at best, and people labelling that stuff "truth" should reseek the definition of "truth" for their own sakes and the sakes of ones around them
Its my understanding that the Catholic Church decided what to put in the Holy Bible.
Celibacy
Back to Top