Originally posted by ThinkOfOne I guess I should have explicitly added calling people "heretics" to the list of vacuous canned responses.
Eladar cannot rationally defend his position so he continues to dance around the fact that he doesn't believe in what Jesus taught about condemning people to death here in John 8 or more generally in Luke 6.
More generally, Eladar dances around ...[text shortened]... ews reflect it - which is the antithesis of the works spoken by Jesus while He walked the Earth.
Truth is truth. Heretic is a heretic. Your opinion is that of the devil, so why bother listening to it?
Originally posted by Eladar Truth is truth. Heretic is a heretic. Your opinion is that of the devil, so why bother listening to it?
Eladar cannot rationally defend his position so he continues to dance around the fact that he doesn't believe in what Jesus taught about condemning people to death here in John 8 or more generally in Luke 6.
More generally, Eladar dances around the fact that he is extremely self-centered and his views reflect it - which is the antithesis of the works spoken by Jesus while He walked the Earth.
Yet somehow, in Eladar's mind, that makes ME the "heretic".
Originally posted by ThinkOfOne Eladar cannot rationally defend his position so he continues to dance around the fact that he doesn't believe in what Jesus taught about condemning people to death here in John 8 or more generally in Luke 6.
More generally, Eladar dances around the fact that he is extremely self-centered and his views reflect it - which is the antithesis of the works ...[text shortened]... somehow, in Eladar's mind, that makes ME the "heretic".
It's laughable, but it is what it is.
Cannot rationally translates to argue based on libtard beliefs.
Originally posted by ThinkOfOne Of course when Eladar can't defend his position, so he repeatedly resorts to vacuous canned responses like "pot", "If that's what you say", etc.
It's laughable, but it is what it is.
He extremely self-centered and his views reflect it - which is the antithesis of the works spoken by Jesus while He walked the Earth.
Just please remember that not all Christians share this one man's views.
[b] " And John answered and said, Master, we saw someone casting out demons in Your name, and we forbade him because he does not follow with us.
But Jesus said to him, Do no forbid him, for he who is not against you is for you." (Luke 9:49,50)
We have hear Jesus teaching tolerance.
Would you need another example ?[/b]So you are saying Jesus told the disciples that homosexuality isn't sinful? He toldthem to tolerate sin?
Kind of confused here since you are babling on about nothing.
Removed
Joined
03 Jan '13
Moves
13080
27 Dec '16 01:12>4 edits
Originally posted by Eladar So you are saying Jesus told the disciples that homosexuality isn't sinful? He toldthem to tolerate sin?
Kind of confused here since you are babling on about nothing.
I am saying that here is an example to address your posed implied question:
I would still like to know what Jesus tolerated.
I did not read any of the posts before this. I simply spoke to this implied question above.
Here's the implied question again:
I would still like to know what Jesus tolerated.
Luke 9:49,50 shows He tolerated what was considered "competition" from others not specifically following Him as the twelve.
And for clarity I would add that He is not teaching infinite tolerance perhaps. But He is teaching His disciples tolerance there.
Ask me something harder, like, maybe "When did Jesus ever vote for Hillary Clinton ?"
Originally posted by robbie carrobie A church or organisation that has watered down the Bibles clear and wholesome teachings and supplanted them with secular liberalism.
An example would be the acceptance of homosexuality the practice of which is clearly condemned in scripture.
Would the acceptance of obesity fit also? Or is gluttony not considered as serious a sin as homosexuality?